Fulham hold a narrow edge in trader consensus at 42.5% implied probability, driven primarily by home advantage at Craven Cottage and stronger recent Premier League form compared to Palace. Both sides enter the fixture with depleted squads, as Palace continue to manage multiple long-term absences including Daniel Munoz and Daichi Kamada alongside international commitments, while Fulham deal with similar AFCON-related gaps. Historical head-to-head results show tight contests with limited clean sheets, supporting the elevated draw probability near 28.5%. Recent momentum shifts, including Fulham’s improved attacking output and Palace’s inconsistent away results, underpin the current pricing without decisive separation between the sides.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoFulham FC – Crystal Palace FC
Moneyline
Tiempo reglamentario$188 Vol.
Spreads
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Totales
Tiempo reglamentario$14 Vol.
Both Teams to Score?
Tiempo reglamentario$422 Vol.
First Team to Score
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Fulham FC Totals
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Crystal Palace FC Totals
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
If Fulham FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No".
This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.
Mercado abierto: Aug 23, 2026, 12:00 AM ET
Fuente de resolución
https://www.premierleague.com/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Fulham FC – Crystal Palace FC
Moneyline
Tiempo reglamentario$188 Vol.
Spreads
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Totales
Tiempo reglamentario$14 Vol.
Both Teams to Score?
Tiempo reglamentario$422 Vol.
First Team to Score
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Fulham FC Totals
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
Crystal Palace FC Totals
Tiempo reglamentario$0 Vol.
If Fulham FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No".
This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.
Mercado abierto: Aug 23, 2026, 12:00 AM ET
Fuente de resolución
https://www.premierleague.com/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Fulham hold a narrow edge in trader consensus at 42.5% implied probability, driven primarily by home advantage at Craven Cottage and stronger recent Premier League form compared to Palace. Both sides enter the fixture with depleted squads, as Palace continue to manage multiple long-term absences including Daniel Munoz and Daichi Kamada alongside international commitments, while Fulham deal with similar AFCON-related gaps. Historical head-to-head results show tight contests with limited clean sheets, supporting the elevated draw probability near 28.5%. Recent momentum shifts, including Fulham’s improved attacking output and Palace’s inconsistent away results, underpin the current pricing without decisive separation between the sides.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoCuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes
Crear un combo
Elige dos opciones


Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes