**The Cuban regime's demonstrated resilience amid severe economic strain underpins the 86.5% "No" odds.** Despite a U.S. fuel blockade imposed in January 2026—following the cutoff of Venezuelan oil exports—and resulting widespread blackouts, shortages, and sporadic protests (including cacerolazos and limited incidents like the March attack on a Communist Party office in Morón), the Communist Party of Cuba retains de facto control through its security forces and institutional cohesion. Miguel Díaz-Canel remains in office and has pursued limited economic reforms announced in June to attract investment and decentralize administration, while acknowledging the need for "urgent changes." U.S. sanctions, including personal measures against the president, and diplomatic pressure have not produced a leadership transition or mass uprising capable of altering core governance structures. Historical precedent shows the regime's capacity to manage crises via repression and elite unity, even as external isolation intensifies. Traders view rapid collapse by year-end as unlikely absent a decisive internal fracture or external military intervention, both of which remain low-probability scenarios based on current evidence.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado¿Cae el régimen cubano en 2026?
¿Cae el régimen cubano en 2026?
Sí
14% probabilidad
$1,625,839 Vol.
$1,625,839 Vol.
30 dic 2026
Sí
14% probabilidad
$1,625,839 Vol.
$1,625,839 Vol.
30 dic 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
**The Cuban regime's demonstrated resilience amid severe economic strain underpins the 86.5% "No" odds.** Despite a U.S. fuel blockade imposed in January 2026—following the cutoff of Venezuelan oil exports—and resulting widespread blackouts, shortages, and sporadic protests (including cacerolazos and limited incidents like the March attack on a Communist Party office in Morón), the Communist Party of Cuba retains de facto control through its security forces and institutional cohesion.
Miguel Díaz-Canel remains in office and has pursued limited economic reforms announced in June to attract investment and decentralize administration, while acknowledging the need for "urgent changes." U.S. sanctions, including personal measures against the president, and diplomatic pressure have not produced a leadership transition or mass uprising capable of altering core governance structures. Historical precedent shows the regime's capacity to manage crises via repression and elite unity, even as external isolation intensifies. Traders view rapid collapse by year-end as unlikely absent a decisive internal fracture or external military intervention, both of which remain low-probability scenarios based on current evidence.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ET
Volumen
$1,625,839Fecha de finalización
31 dic 2026Mercado abierto
Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
**The Cuban regime's demonstrated resilience amid severe economic strain underpins the 86.5% "No" odds.** Despite a U.S. fuel blockade imposed in January 2026—following the cutoff of Venezuelan oil exports—and resulting widespread blackouts, shortages, and sporadic protests (including cacerolazos and limited incidents like the March attack on a Communist Party office in Morón), the Communist Party of Cuba retains de facto control through its security forces and institutional cohesion.
Miguel Díaz-Canel remains in office and has pursued limited economic reforms announced in June to attract investment and decentralize administration, while acknowledging the need for "urgent changes." U.S. sanctions, including personal measures against the president, and diplomatic pressure have not produced a leadership transition or mass uprising capable of altering core governance structures. Historical precedent shows the regime's capacity to manage crises via repression and elite unity, even as external isolation intensifies. Traders view rapid collapse by year-end as unlikely absent a decisive internal fracture or external military intervention, both of which remain low-probability scenarios based on current evidence.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$1,625,839Fecha de finalización
31 dic 2026Mercado abierto
Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**The Cuban regime's demonstrated resilience amid severe economic strain underpins the 86.5% "No" odds.** Despite a U.S. fuel blockade imposed in January 2026—following the cutoff of Venezuelan oil exports—and resulting widespread blackouts, shortages, and sporadic protests (including cacerolazos and limited incidents like the March attack on a Communist Party office in Morón), the Communist Party of Cuba retains de facto control through its security forces and institutional cohesion. Miguel Díaz-Canel remains in office and has pursued limited economic reforms announced in June to attract investment and decentralize administration, while acknowledging the need for "urgent changes." U.S. sanctions, including personal measures against the president, and diplomatic pressure have not produced a leadership transition or mass uprising capable of altering core governance structures. Historical precedent shows the regime's capacity to manage crises via repression and elite unity, even as external isolation intensifies. Traders view rapid collapse by year-end as unlikely absent a decisive internal fracture or external military intervention, both of which remain low-probability scenarios based on current evidence.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes