Trump’s AI policy has emphasized accelerating American innovation and global dominance while avoiding mandatory regulations that could slow development or cede ground to China. Early in the term, the administration revoked the prior executive order on AI safety, released an action plan focused on infrastructure and exports, and issued directives preempting state-level rules seen as burdensome. A draft order for pre-release government review of frontier models was withdrawn in May 2026 after industry concerns about competitiveness; the revised June 2, 2026 order established only a voluntary 30-day review process alongside cybersecurity measures and explicitly disclaimed licensing or pre-clearance requirements. These developments reflect ongoing White House balancing of national security priorities against deregulatory goals, with limited further executive action signaled since the summer.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado30 de septiembre
3%
31 de octubre
8%
31 de diciembre
15%
$1,625 Vol.
30 de septiembre
3%
31 de octubre
8%
31 de diciembre
15%
A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Sep 17, 2026, 2:28 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...A mandatory requirement is one AI model developers or deployers must meet as a condition of training, releasing, or operating a model, such as pre-release government review, required safety testing, compute or capability thresholds that trigger obligations, restrictions on training data, limits on autonomous operation, or prohibitions on specified uses. An order that directs an agency to establish such a requirement within a stated period qualifies.
Studies, reports, guidance, standards, or voluntary frameworks do not count. Orders that only govern the federal government's own use or procurement of AI, impose export or chip controls, regulate data-center energy or permitting, address immigration, or regulate only AI-generated content do not qualify.
The signing or issuance of a qualifying order within this market's timeframe will qualify for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of when the order takes effect, and regardless of whether it is subsequently stayed, enjoined, revoked, or superseded.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of the United States, including the text of presidential actions published at whitehouse.gov and in the Federal Register; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trump’s AI policy has emphasized accelerating American innovation and global dominance while avoiding mandatory regulations that could slow development or cede ground to China. Early in the term, the administration revoked the prior executive order on AI safety, released an action plan focused on infrastructure and exports, and issued directives preempting state-level rules seen as burdensome. A draft order for pre-release government review of frontier models was withdrawn in May 2026 after industry concerns about competitiveness; the revised June 2, 2026 order established only a voluntary 30-day review process alongside cybersecurity measures and explicitly disclaimed licensing or pre-clearance requirements. These developments reflect ongoing White House balancing of national security priorities against deregulatory goals, with limited further executive action signaled since the summer.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado


Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes