Ukraine’s ongoing war with Russia, combined with stalled negotiations and Kyiv’s firm stance on military readiness, underpins the market’s 94% implied probability against any agreement limiting armed forces size before 2027. Recent statements from Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov on August 28, 2026, stressed the need to sustain mobilization of at least 30,000 personnel monthly and described an early end to fighting as unrealistic. Draft U.S. peace frameworks from late 2025 that floated peacetime caps near 800,000 were revised after Ukrainian pushback, with strict numerical limits reportedly dropped or reframed as non-binding. Kyiv continues military reforms focused on contracts, pay, and force sustainability rather than reductions, while Russia’s demands remain unmet amid active frontline operations. These dynamics leave little scope for a formal cap agreement within the market’s timeframe.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourOui
$115,848 Vol.
$115,848 Vol.
Oui
$115,848 Vol.
$115,848 Vol.
An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Marché ouvert : Nov 20, 2025, 6:10 PM ET
Résolveur
0x65070BE91...An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Résolveur
0x65070BE91...Ukraine’s ongoing war with Russia, combined with stalled negotiations and Kyiv’s firm stance on military readiness, underpins the market’s 94% implied probability against any agreement limiting armed forces size before 2027. Recent statements from Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov on August 28, 2026, stressed the need to sustain mobilization of at least 30,000 personnel monthly and described an early end to fighting as unrealistic. Draft U.S. peace frameworks from late 2025 that floated peacetime caps near 800,000 were revised after Ukrainian pushback, with strict numerical limits reportedly dropped or reframed as non-binding. Kyiv continues military reforms focused on contracts, pay, and force sustainability rather than reductions, while Russia’s demands remain unmet amid active frontline operations. These dynamics leave little scope for a formal cap agreement within the market’s timeframe.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour



Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes