The tight legislative calendar in California, combined with AB 2624’s current position in the Assembly Appropriations Committee after a May 14 do-pass vote, makes enactment by June 30 highly unlikely. The measure, which expands the Safe at Home address-confidentiality program to immigration support providers and restricts certain online disclosures, still requires full Assembly and Senate approval plus the governor’s signature. Republican opposition, centered on free-speech concerns and potential limits on public scrutiny of service providers, has drawn attention but has not altered the procedural path. With fewer than six weeks remaining before the deadline, the compressed timeline and standard bicameral process explain the market’s strong consensus against the bill becoming law on schedule.