Trump's established pattern of issuing pointed public remarks on Truth Social and in press settings against critics, media figures, and political opponents continues to shape expectations for this market through June 30. Recent examples include comments targeting Supreme Court justices over tariff rulings earlier in the year, ongoing exchanges with Pope Leo XIV regarding foreign policy, and a June 9 statement questioning commentator Stephen A. Smith's aptitude. Tensions with late-night hosts, journalists, and international actors tied to ongoing diplomatic and trade matters provide additional catalysts. Scheduled events such as cabinet meetings, potential midterms-related statements, and any further developments in U.S. foreign policy could prompt additional remarks within the resolution window. Trader assessments reflect this recurring behavior amid a polarized environment where public exchanges often escalate quickly.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$751,064 Vol.
2026/06/30
Jimmy Kimmel
61%
Norah O'Donnell
41%
Megyn Kelly
32%
Nicolás Maduro
37%
Alex Jones
32%
Vladimir Putin
29%
Keir Starmer
26%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Emmanuel Macron
16%
Benjamin Netanyahu
15%
Freidrich Merz
14%
Pope Leo XIV
10%
Pam Bondi
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
J.D. Vance
4%
Elon Musk
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Viktor Orbán
3%
Melania Trump
1%
$751,064 Vol.
Jimmy Kimmel
$39,345 Vol.
61%
Norah O'Donnell
$506 Vol.
41%
Megyn Kelly
$427 Vol.
32%
Nicolás Maduro
$3,100 Vol.
37%
Alex Jones
$287 Vol.
32%
Vladimir Putin
$8,096 Vol.
29%
Keir Starmer
$1,221 Vol.
26%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,060 Vol.
19%
Emmanuel Macron
$3,914 Vol.
16%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$67,958 Vol.
15%
Freidrich Merz
$6,867 Vol.
14%
Pope Leo XIV
$10,186 Vol.
10%
Pam Bondi
$2,746 Vol.
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
$5,057 Vol.
7%
J.D. Vance
$4,269 Vol.
4%
Elon Musk
$2,834 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$32,897 Vol.
3%
Viktor Orbán
$4,179 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$4,513 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's established pattern of issuing pointed public remarks on Truth Social and in press settings against critics, media figures, and political opponents continues to shape expectations for this market through June 30. Recent examples include comments targeting Supreme Court justices over tariff rulings earlier in the year, ongoing exchanges with Pope Leo XIV regarding foreign policy, and a June 9 statement questioning commentator Stephen A. Smith's aptitude. Tensions with late-night hosts, journalists, and international actors tied to ongoing diplomatic and trade matters provide additional catalysts. Scheduled events such as cabinet meetings, potential midterms-related statements, and any further developments in U.S. foreign policy could prompt additional remarks within the resolution window. Trader assessments reflect this recurring behavior amid a polarized environment where public exchanges often escalate quickly.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ET
音量
$751,064終了日
2026/06/30マーケット開始日
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's established pattern of issuing pointed public remarks on Truth Social and in press settings against critics, media figures, and political opponents continues to shape expectations for this market through June 30. Recent examples include comments targeting Supreme Court justices over tariff rulings earlier in the year, ongoing exchanges with Pope Leo XIV regarding foreign policy, and a June 9 statement questioning commentator Stephen A. Smith's aptitude. Tensions with late-night hosts, journalists, and international actors tied to ongoing diplomatic and trade matters provide additional catalysts. Scheduled events such as cabinet meetings, potential midterms-related statements, and any further developments in U.S. foreign policy could prompt additional remarks within the resolution window. Trader assessments reflect this recurring behavior amid a polarized environment where public exchanges often escalate quickly.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$751,064終了日
2026/06/30マーケット開始日
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's established pattern of issuing pointed public remarks on Truth Social and in press settings against critics, media figures, and political opponents continues to shape expectations for this market through June 30. Recent examples include comments targeting Supreme Court justices over tariff rulings earlier in the year, ongoing exchanges with Pope Leo XIV regarding foreign policy, and a June 9 statement questioning commentator Stephen A. Smith's aptitude. Tensions with late-night hosts, journalists, and international actors tied to ongoing diplomatic and trade matters provide additional catalysts. Scheduled events such as cabinet meetings, potential midterms-related statements, and any further developments in U.S. foreign policy could prompt additional remarks within the resolution window. Trader assessments reflect this recurring behavior amid a polarized environment where public exchanges often escalate quickly.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問