The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트예
$21,423 거래량
$21,423 거래량
예
$21,423 거래량
$21,423 거래량
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
마켓 개설일: Jan 20, 2026, 10:54 AM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
자주 묻는 질문