California’s Proposition 39, a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment requiring government-issued photo ID for in-person voting or the last four digits of such ID for mail ballots plus enhanced citizenship verification on voter rolls, qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot after proponents collected more than 1.3 million signatures. The measure faces organized opposition from voting rights coalitions and the ACLU, which highlight potential barriers for the roughly 80 percent of Californians who vote by mail and communities with lower ID possession rates. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office revised the official ballot title and summary in July 2026, prompting accusations of bias from backers. With Democrats holding unified control of state government and a long record of expanding access-focused election rules, trader consensus reflected in the 56.5 percent “No” price incorporates the state’s partisan baseline, the scale of the anti-measure campaign, and the absence of polling showing majority support for new ID mandates. Resolution hinges on certified results from the November election.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоРеферендум по удостоверению личности избирателя в Калифорнии проходит?
Да
Да
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the voter identification initiative proposed by Reform California or any other statewide ballot measure that establishes a voter ID requirement for voting in California elections is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If by the last legally operative deadline for placing measures on the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot, including any deadline set or modified by statute governing the initiative qualification process, no qualifying voter identification initiative has been approved for submission to voters, and there is no enacted statute or pending court order that could still place such a measure on that ballot, the market will resolve “No”.
If the election is officially rescheduled, the same rule applies to the new ballot and its corresponding deadlines.
The resolution source will be based on the official certified results of the vote as published by the California Secretary of State. Subsequent litigation, administrative challenges, or failure of any post-approval triggers will not be considered.
Открытие рынка: Mar 16, 2026, 6:02 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the voter identification initiative proposed by Reform California or any other statewide ballot measure that establishes a voter ID requirement for voting in California elections is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If by the last legally operative deadline for placing measures on the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot, including any deadline set or modified by statute governing the initiative qualification process, no qualifying voter identification initiative has been approved for submission to voters, and there is no enacted statute or pending court order that could still place such a measure on that ballot, the market will resolve “No”.
If the election is officially rescheduled, the same rule applies to the new ballot and its corresponding deadlines.
The resolution source will be based on the official certified results of the vote as published by the California Secretary of State. Subsequent litigation, administrative challenges, or failure of any post-approval triggers will not be considered.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...California’s Proposition 39, a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment requiring government-issued photo ID for in-person voting or the last four digits of such ID for mail ballots plus enhanced citizenship verification on voter rolls, qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot after proponents collected more than 1.3 million signatures. The measure faces organized opposition from voting rights coalitions and the ACLU, which highlight potential barriers for the roughly 80 percent of Californians who vote by mail and communities with lower ID possession rates. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office revised the official ballot title and summary in July 2026, prompting accusations of bias from backers. With Democrats holding unified control of state government and a long record of expanding access-focused election rules, trader consensus reflected in the 56.5 percent “No” price incorporates the state’s partisan baseline, the scale of the anti-measure campaign, and the absence of polling showing majority support for new ID mandates. Resolution hinges on certified results from the November election.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено

Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы