Roster instability in Valorant Champions Tour circuits shapes sentiment around which players will depart teams in 2026, with contract expirations, mid-season performance dips, and organizational rebuilds serving as primary drivers. Recent free agency windows and roster lock deadlines have already triggered moves for several high-profile names, while teams like those in the Americas and EMEA leagues weigh chemistry issues against upcoming international roster slots. Factors such as agent meta shifts, coaching changes, and reported interest from rival organizations accelerate speculation, particularly for players whose deals run through the end of the 2025 season. Traders monitor official announcements, scrim leaks, and head-to-head results closely, as late qualifying offers or buyouts can alter trajectories right up to the next transfer window. Historical patterns show that underperforming squads or those missing playoffs often accelerate departures, though star retention remains common when competitive windows align.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоDemon1
64%
Primmie
60%
Cryocells
37%
BuZz
35%
Jemkin
49%
Asuna
33%
invy
33%
Meteor
34%
valyn
26%
something
25%
D4v41
23%
Jawgemo
21%
kiNgg
20%
Skuba
18%
leaf
17%
Sato
15%
brawk
14%
f0rsaken
14%
Jinggg
14%
trent
9%
$2,676 Объем
Demon1
64%
Primmie
60%
Cryocells
37%
BuZz
35%
Jemkin
49%
Asuna
33%
invy
33%
Meteor
34%
valyn
26%
something
25%
D4v41
23%
Jawgemo
21%
kiNgg
20%
Skuba
18%
leaf
17%
Sato
15%
brawk
14%
f0rsaken
14%
Jinggg
14%
trent
9%
For the purpose of this market, the listed player is considered to have "left" if they are officially removed from the listed team's active roster — including a transfer to another team, release, benching to inactive/reserve, loan to another team, retirement, or any other departure from the active lineup — as reflected on the team's Liquipedia page (https://liquipedia.net/valorant). The player being a stand-in for another team while still rostered does not by itself count.
The change must occur on or before the deadline and be reflected in the resolution source. Once the departure appears in the resolution source, it must remain in effect for at least 48 continuous hours to be valid. This 48-hour period may finish after the deadline, so long as the departure itself occurred on or before the deadline. If the change is reverted before 48 hours have elapsed, it will not count toward resolution.
A name change or alias referring to the same player on the same team does not count as leaving. Temporary absence for a single match (with the player remaining on the roster) does not count.
If the listed team disbands, or the listed player and the team part ways because the roster is dissolved, this will count as the player leaving and resolve "Yes".
The primary resolution source for this market will be Liquipedia; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Открытие рынка: Aug 6, 2026, 11:45 AM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purpose of this market, the listed player is considered to have "left" if they are officially removed from the listed team's active roster — including a transfer to another team, release, benching to inactive/reserve, loan to another team, retirement, or any other departure from the active lineup — as reflected on the team's Liquipedia page (https://liquipedia.net/valorant). The player being a stand-in for another team while still rostered does not by itself count.
The change must occur on or before the deadline and be reflected in the resolution source. Once the departure appears in the resolution source, it must remain in effect for at least 48 continuous hours to be valid. This 48-hour period may finish after the deadline, so long as the departure itself occurred on or before the deadline. If the change is reverted before 48 hours have elapsed, it will not count toward resolution.
A name change or alias referring to the same player on the same team does not count as leaving. Temporary absence for a single match (with the player remaining on the roster) does not count.
If the listed team disbands, or the listed player and the team part ways because the roster is dissolved, this will count as the player leaving and resolve "Yes".
The primary resolution source for this market will be Liquipedia; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Roster instability in Valorant Champions Tour circuits shapes sentiment around which players will depart teams in 2026, with contract expirations, mid-season performance dips, and organizational rebuilds serving as primary drivers. Recent free agency windows and roster lock deadlines have already triggered moves for several high-profile names, while teams like those in the Americas and EMEA leagues weigh chemistry issues against upcoming international roster slots. Factors such as agent meta shifts, coaching changes, and reported interest from rival organizations accelerate speculation, particularly for players whose deals run through the end of the 2025 season. Traders monitor official announcements, scrim leaks, and head-to-head results closely, as late qualifying offers or buyouts can alter trajectories right up to the next transfer window. Historical patterns show that underperforming squads or those missing playoffs often accelerate departures, though star retention remains common when competitive windows align.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено



Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы