The 2026 Liga Profesional remains tightly contested midway through the campaign, with the aggregate table showing Vélez Sarsfield, Instituto, Estudiantes (LP), and Boca Juniors clustered near the top after the Apertura and early Clausura matches. Instituto and promoted side Estudiantes (RC) sit slightly ahead in trader pricing due to strong recent results and defensive organization, yet the broad 44–47.5% range across nearly the entire field reflects deep parity. Traditional powers River Plate, Racing, Independiente, and Talleres share similar records and fixture difficulties with mid-table sides like Banfield, Huracán, and Platense, while no team has established consistent dominance or a significant points cushion. Schedule balance, squad rotation, and the split-tournament format continue to limit separation, sustaining the narrow implied probabilities.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоIndependiente Rivadavia 48%
Instituto 47%
Estudiantes (RC) 46%
Estudiantes (LP) 45%
Independiente Rivadavia
48%
Instituto
47%
Estudiantes (RC)
46%
Estudiantes (LP)
45%
River Plate
45%
Newell's Old Boys
45%
Rosario Central
45%
Tigre
45%
Banfield
45%
Gimnasia y Esgrima (LP)
45%
Independiente
45%
Racing
45%
Talleres (C)
45%
Atlético Tucumán
45%
Defensa y Justicia
45%
San Lorenzo
45%
Sarmiento (J)
45%
Belgrano
45%
Gimnasia y Esgrima (M)
45%
Huracán
45%
Unión
45%
Vélez Sarsfield
45%
Central Córdoba (SdE)
44%
Boca Juniors
44%
Deportivo Riestra
44%
Aldosivi
44%
Barracas Central
44%
Lanús
44%
Argentinos Juniors
43%
Platense
41%
Independiente Rivadavia 48%
Instituto 47%
Estudiantes (RC) 46%
Estudiantes (LP) 45%
Independiente Rivadavia
48%
Instituto
47%
Estudiantes (RC)
46%
Estudiantes (LP)
45%
River Plate
45%
Newell's Old Boys
45%
Rosario Central
45%
Tigre
45%
Banfield
45%
Gimnasia y Esgrima (LP)
45%
Independiente
45%
Racing
45%
Talleres (C)
45%
Atlético Tucumán
45%
Defensa y Justicia
45%
San Lorenzo
45%
Sarmiento (J)
45%
Belgrano
45%
Gimnasia y Esgrima (M)
45%
Huracán
45%
Unión
45%
Vélez Sarsfield
45%
Central Córdoba (SdE)
44%
Boca Juniors
44%
Deportivo Riestra
44%
Aldosivi
44%
Barracas Central
44%
Lanús
44%
Argentinos Juniors
43%
Platense
41%
If at any point it becomes impossible for a listed participant to finish as runner-up of Liga Profesional (Argentina) for the 2026 season per the rules of Liga Profesional (Argentina) (e.g., the participant is eliminated), the corresponding market will resolve to "No".
If multiple teams are declared as second-place finishers, this market will resolve in favor of the team whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
If this event is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or a runner-up has not been declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source will be official information from the Liga Profesional (Argentina); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Ринок відкрито: Aug 12, 2026, 1:27 PM ET
Джерело вирішення
https://www.afa.com.ar/es/liga-profesional-de-futbolResolver
0x69c47De9D...If at any point it becomes impossible for a listed participant to finish as runner-up of Liga Profesional (Argentina) for the 2026 season per the rules of Liga Profesional (Argentina) (e.g., the participant is eliminated), the corresponding market will resolve to "No".
If multiple teams are declared as second-place finishers, this market will resolve in favor of the team whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
If this event is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or a runner-up has not been declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source will be official information from the Liga Profesional (Argentina); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Джерело вирішення
https://www.afa.com.ar/es/liga-profesional-de-futbolResolver
0x69c47De9D...The 2026 Liga Profesional remains tightly contested midway through the campaign, with the aggregate table showing Vélez Sarsfield, Instituto, Estudiantes (LP), and Boca Juniors clustered near the top after the Apertura and early Clausura matches. Instituto and promoted side Estudiantes (RC) sit slightly ahead in trader pricing due to strong recent results and defensive organization, yet the broad 44–47.5% range across nearly the entire field reflects deep parity. Traditional powers River Plate, Racing, Independiente, and Talleres share similar records and fixture difficulties with mid-table sides like Banfield, Huracán, and Platense, while no team has established consistent dominance or a significant points cushion. Schedule balance, squad rotation, and the split-tournament format continue to limit separation, sustaining the narrow implied probabilities.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено


Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання