The Supreme Court’s April 27, 2026, oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell centered on whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims when the EPA has not required a cancer warning on Roundup labels. With the Court’s conservative majority and the Trump administration filing in support of preemption, traders assign an 88 percent implied probability to a ruling favoring Monsanto, reflecting historical patterns in regulatory preemption cases and the limited prospects for states to impose additional labeling obligations after EPA approval. A decision is expected by late June 2026 and could affect thousands of pending Roundup lawsuits.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоSCOTUS rules in favor of Monsanto?
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Ринок відкрито: Apr 9, 2026, 5:07 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court’s April 27, 2026, oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell centered on whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims when the EPA has not required a cancer warning on Roundup labels. With the Court’s conservative majority and the Trump administration filing in support of preemption, traders assign an 88 percent implied probability to a ruling favoring Monsanto, reflecting historical patterns in regulatory preemption cases and the limited prospects for states to impose additional labeling obligations after EPA approval. A decision is expected by late June 2026 and could affect thousands of pending Roundup lawsuits.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання