The 2026 Emmy Awards ceremony on September 14 remained notably low-key, with host Mariska Hargitay steering clear of political commentary and most winners focusing on craft rather than current events. Producers appear to have enforced tighter scripting and timing controls compared to past awards shows, limiting opportunities for on-air jabs despite Hollywood's well-documented tensions with President Trump. Pre-ceremony signals like Jimmy Kimmel's FYC campaign highlighting Trump's attacks and South Park's off-broadcast trolling created some trader expectations of shade, yet the live NBC broadcast featured only indirect references, such as Sally Field's positive nod to Canada amid trade disputes. This restraint, paired with the market's strict definition of a qualifying insult during the broadcast window, underpins the strong consensus behind "No."
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於在2026年艾美獎期間，有人會侮辱唐納德·特朗普嗎？
在2026年艾美獎期間，有人會侮辱唐納德·特朗普嗎？
是
2% 機率
$8,920 交易量
$8,920 交易量
2026-09-14
是
2% 機率
$8,920 交易量
$8,920 交易量
2026-09-14
This market will resolve to "Yes" if anyone makes a public statement insulting Donald Trump at any point during the live broadcast of the 2026 Primetime Emmy Awards, scheduled for September 14, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.The 2026 Emmy Awards ceremony on September 14 remained notably low-key, with host Mariska Hargitay steering clear of political commentary and most winners focusing on craft rather than current events. Producers appear to have enforced tighter scripting and timing controls compared to past awards shows, limiting opportunities for on-air jabs despite Hollywood's well-documented tensions with President Trump. Pre-ceremony signals like Jimmy Kimmel's FYC campaign highlighting Trump's attacks and South Park's off-broadcast trolling created some trader expectations of shade, yet the live NBC broadcast featured only indirect references, such as Sally Field's positive nod to Canada amid trade disputes. This restraint, paired with the market's strict definition of a qualifying insult during the broadcast window, underpins the strong consensus behind "No."
This market will resolve to "Yes" if anyone makes a public statement insulting Donald Trump at any point during the live broadcast of the 2026 Primetime Emmy Awards, scheduled for September 14, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.
市場開放時間： Aug 19, 2026, 9:25 PM ET
交易量
$8,920結束日期
2026-09-14市場開放時間
Aug 19, 2026, 9:25 PM ETThis market will resolve to "Yes" if anyone makes a public statement insulting Donald Trump at any point during the live broadcast of the 2026 Primetime Emmy Awards, scheduled for September 14, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.The 2026 Emmy Awards ceremony on September 14 remained notably low-key, with host Mariska Hargitay steering clear of political commentary and most winners focusing on craft rather than current events. Producers appear to have enforced tighter scripting and timing controls compared to past awards shows, limiting opportunities for on-air jabs despite Hollywood's well-documented tensions with President Trump. Pre-ceremony signals like Jimmy Kimmel's FYC campaign highlighting Trump's attacks and South Park's off-broadcast trolling created some trader expectations of shade, yet the live NBC broadcast featured only indirect references, such as Sally Field's positive nod to Canada amid trade disputes. This restraint, paired with the market's strict definition of a qualifying insult during the broadcast window, underpins the strong consensus behind "No."
This market will resolve to "Yes" if anyone makes a public statement insulting Donald Trump at any point during the live broadcast of the 2026 Primetime Emmy Awards, scheduled for September 14, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.
A qualifying statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement made on stage or during any other on-air segment of the broadcast, the direct language of which is captured in the live or recorded broadcast. Statements made off-air, backstage, or outside the broadcast window will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
A statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Donald Trump either personally or professionally. This includes calling him a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname, using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., "He isn't smart", "He has no judgment"). Disparaging him in his professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster president," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at his specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to Donald Trump will qualify even if he is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that he is the subject.
The resolution source will be the official NBC/Peacock broadcast of the ceremony.
交易量
$8,920結束日期
2026-09-14市場開放時間
Aug 19, 2026, 9:25 PM ETThe 2026 Emmy Awards ceremony on September 14 remained notably low-key, with host Mariska Hargitay steering clear of political commentary and most winners focusing on craft rather than current events. Producers appear to have enforced tighter scripting and timing controls compared to past awards shows, limiting opportunities for on-air jabs despite Hollywood's well-documented tensions with President Trump. Pre-ceremony signals like Jimmy Kimmel's FYC campaign highlighting Trump's attacks and South Park's off-broadcast trolling created some trader expectations of shade, yet the live NBC broadcast featured only indirect references, such as Sally Field's positive nod to Canada amid trade disputes. This restraint, paired with the market's strict definition of a qualifying insult during the broadcast window, underpins the strong consensus behind "No."
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions