Trump's established pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through public statements, press interactions, social media posts, and speeches continues to shape trader consensus on these date-specific markets. As president in 2026, he has repeatedly targeted journalists, political figures, and foreign leaders amid ongoing tensions over Iran policy, trade matters, and domestic legislation such as voting reforms. Recent examples include multiple attacks during the July White House Correspondents' Dinner, rebukes of reporters questioning Senate schedules or prosecutorial decisions, and statements on adversaries in the Strait of Hormuz. Upcoming scheduled events like press briefings, legislative pushes, or diplomatic developments could prompt further remarks, though resolution hinges on verifiable public language meeting the market's criteria for insults or mockery. This track record drives the wisdom of crowds reflected in current pricing.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado$23,395 Vol.
3 sep 2026
3 de septiembre
61%
5 de septiembre
71%
6 de septiembre
51%
7 de septiembre
44%
8 de septiembre
89%
9 de septiembre
90%
10 de septiembre
88%
11 de septiembre
88%
12 de septiembre
52%
13 de septiembre
86%
14 de septiembre
91%
15 de septiembre
88%
16 de septiembre
90%
17 de septiembre
91%
18 de septiembre
54%
19 de septiembre
87%
20 de septiembre
53%
21 de septiembre
91%
22 de septiembre
83%
23 de septiembre
86%
24 de septiembre
89%
25 de septiembre
61%
26 de septiembre
88%
27 de septiembre
85%
28 de septiembre
91%
29 de septiembre
51%
30 de septiembre
93%
$23,395 Vol.
3 de septiembre
$2,404 Vol.
61%
5 de septiembre
$1,503 Vol.
71%
6 de septiembre
$506 Vol.
51%
7 de septiembre
$935 Vol.
44%
8 de septiembre
$320 Vol.
89%
9 de septiembre
$931 Vol.
90%
10 de septiembre
$734 Vol.
88%
11 de septiembre
$2,147 Vol.
88%
12 de septiembre
$241 Vol.
52%
13 de septiembre
$380 Vol.
86%
14 de septiembre
$383 Vol.
91%
15 de septiembre
$175 Vol.
88%
16 de septiembre
$1,211 Vol.
90%
17 de septiembre
$1,018 Vol.
91%
18 de septiembre
$0 Vol.
54%
19 de septiembre
$216 Vol.
87%
20 de septiembre
$252 Vol.
53%
21 de septiembre
$222 Vol.
91%
22 de septiembre
$130 Vol.
83%
23 de septiembre
$736 Vol.
86%
24 de septiembre
$624 Vol.
89%
25 de septiembre
$586 Vol.
61%
26 de septiembre
$434 Vol.
88%
27 de septiembre
$775 Vol.
85%
28 de septiembre
$210 Vol.
91%
29 de septiembre
$196 Vol.
51%
30 de septiembre
$256 Vol.
93%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's established pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through public statements, press interactions, social media posts, and speeches continues to shape trader consensus on these date-specific markets. As president in 2026, he has repeatedly targeted journalists, political figures, and foreign leaders amid ongoing tensions over Iran policy, trade matters, and domestic legislation such as voting reforms. Recent examples include multiple attacks during the July White House Correspondents' Dinner, rebukes of reporters questioning Senate schedules or prosecutorial decisions, and statements on adversaries in the Strait of Hormuz. Upcoming scheduled events like press briefings, legislative pushes, or diplomatic developments could prompt further remarks, though resolution hinges on verifiable public language meeting the market's criteria for insults or mockery. This track record drives the wisdom of crowds reflected in current pricing.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Sep 2, 2026, 5:16 PM ET
Volumen
$23,395Fecha de finalización
1 oct 2026Mercado abierto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:16 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's established pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through public statements, press interactions, social media posts, and speeches continues to shape trader consensus on these date-specific markets. As president in 2026, he has repeatedly targeted journalists, political figures, and foreign leaders amid ongoing tensions over Iran policy, trade matters, and domestic legislation such as voting reforms. Recent examples include multiple attacks during the July White House Correspondents' Dinner, rebukes of reporters questioning Senate schedules or prosecutorial decisions, and statements on adversaries in the Strait of Hormuz. Upcoming scheduled events like press briefings, legislative pushes, or diplomatic developments could prompt further remarks, though resolution hinges on verifiable public language meeting the market's criteria for insults or mockery. This track record drives the wisdom of crowds reflected in current pricing.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available on the specified date (ET). Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$23,395Fecha de finalización
1 oct 2026Mercado abierto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:16 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's established pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through public statements, press interactions, social media posts, and speeches continues to shape trader consensus on these date-specific markets. As president in 2026, he has repeatedly targeted journalists, political figures, and foreign leaders amid ongoing tensions over Iran policy, trade matters, and domestic legislation such as voting reforms. Recent examples include multiple attacks during the July White House Correspondents' Dinner, rebukes of reporters questioning Senate schedules or prosecutorial decisions, and statements on adversaries in the Strait of Hormuz. Upcoming scheduled events like press briefings, legislative pushes, or diplomatic developments could prompt further remarks, though resolution hinges on verifiable public language meeting the market's criteria for insults or mockery. This track record drives the wisdom of crowds reflected in current pricing.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes