Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a strong position in the November 3, 2026, North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 race, with trader pricing reflecting her incumbency, substantial fundraising edge exceeding $4 million raised compared to Republican challenger Sarah Stevens’ roughly $336,000, and recent August polls showing her ahead by 3–6 points among likely voters amid double-digit undecided shares. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to campaign full time, yet the contest centers on maintaining the court’s current 5-2 Republican majority, with Earls seeking to preserve Democratic representation ahead of potential 2028 shifts. Earls released her first digital ad in early September as both candidates emphasize differing records on voting rights and redistricting issues that have defined their prior clashes. The race remains within the resolution window through election day.
Polymarket डेटा का संदर्भ देने वाला प्रयोगात्मक AI-जनरेटेड सारांश। यह ट्रेडिंग सलाह नहीं है और इस बाज़ार के समाधान में कोई भूमिका नहीं निभाता। · अपडेट किया गयानया
नया
3 नव, 2026
अनीता अर्ल्स (डेमोक्रेट)
78%
सारा स्टीवंस (रिपब्लिकन)
20%
नया
नया
3 नव, 2026
अनीता अर्ल्स (डेमोक्रेट)
$1,045 वॉल्यूम
78%
सारा स्टीवंस (रिपब्लिकन)
$186 वॉल्यूम
20%
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a strong position in the November 3, 2026, North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 race, with trader pricing reflecting her incumbency, substantial fundraising edge exceeding $4 million raised compared to Republican challenger Sarah Stevens’ roughly $336,000, and recent August polls showing her ahead by 3–6 points among likely voters amid double-digit undecided shares. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to campaign full time, yet the contest centers on maintaining the court’s current 5-2 Republican majority, with Earls seeking to preserve Democratic representation ahead of potential 2028 shifts. Earls released her first digital ad in early September as both candidates emphasize differing records on voting rights and redistricting issues that have defined their prior clashes. The race remains within the resolution window through election day.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
बाज़ार खुला: Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ET
वॉल्यूम
$1,232समाप्ति तिथि
4 नव, 2026बाज़ार खुला
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETरिज़ॉल्वर
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a strong position in the November 3, 2026, North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 race, with trader pricing reflecting her incumbency, substantial fundraising edge exceeding $4 million raised compared to Republican challenger Sarah Stevens’ roughly $336,000, and recent August polls showing her ahead by 3–6 points among likely voters amid double-digit undecided shares. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to campaign full time, yet the contest centers on maintaining the court’s current 5-2 Republican majority, with Earls seeking to preserve Democratic representation ahead of potential 2028 shifts. Earls released her first digital ad in early September as both candidates emphasize differing records on voting rights and redistricting issues that have defined their prior clashes. The race remains within the resolution window through election day.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
वॉल्यूम
$1,232समाप्ति तिथि
4 नव, 2026बाज़ार खुला
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETरिज़ॉल्वर
0x69c47De9D...Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a strong position in the November 3, 2026, North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 race, with trader pricing reflecting her incumbency, substantial fundraising edge exceeding $4 million raised compared to Republican challenger Sarah Stevens’ roughly $336,000, and recent August polls showing her ahead by 3–6 points among likely voters amid double-digit undecided shares. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to campaign full time, yet the contest centers on maintaining the court’s current 5-2 Republican majority, with Earls seeking to preserve Democratic representation ahead of potential 2028 shifts. Earls released her first digital ad in early September as both candidates emphasize differing records on voting rights and redistricting issues that have defined their prior clashes. The race remains within the resolution window through election day.
Polymarket डेटा का संदर्भ देने वाला प्रयोगात्मक AI-जनरेटेड सारांश। यह ट्रेडिंग सलाह नहीं है और इस बाज़ार के समाधान में कोई भूमिका नहीं निभाता। · अपडेट किया गया
बाहरी लिंक से सावधान रहें।
बाहरी लिंक से सावधान रहें।
अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न