Skip to main content
icon for ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？
政治·スペンサー・プラット

ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？

icon for ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？
政治·スペンサー・プラット

ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？

はい

7% 確率
Polymarket
新規

はい

7% 確率
Polymarket
新規
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The elevated trader consensus against any U.S. court ruling the June 2026 Los Angeles mayoral primary fraudulent reflects the absence of verified evidence supporting such claims. Official ballot data from Los Angeles County and statements by federal prosecutors, including the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, have debunked specific allegations of manipulated vote batches during the slow tabulation process. California’s standard procedures for counting mail ballots and same-day registrations explain the incremental updates that fueled online speculation after Spencer Pratt fell to third place behind Karen Bass and Nithya Raman. Ongoing investigations have identified no widespread irregularities that would meet legal thresholds for a judicial finding of fraud, and no lawsuits have advanced to produce a favorable ruling within typical timelines.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count.

A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count.

The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
音量
$425
マーケット開始日
Jun 8, 2026, 5:35 PM ET

Resolver

0x65070BE91...
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The elevated trader consensus against any U.S. court ruling the June 2026 Los Angeles mayoral primary fraudulent reflects the absence of verified evidence supporting such claims. Official ballot data from Los Angeles County and statements by federal prosecutors, including the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, have debunked specific allegations of manipulated vote batches during the slow tabulation process. California’s standard procedures for counting mail ballots and same-day registrations explain the incremental updates that fueled online speculation after Spencer Pratt fell to third place behind Karen Bass and Nithya Raman. Ongoing investigations have identified no widespread irregularities that would meet legal thresholds for a judicial finding of fraud, and no lawsuits have advanced to produce a favorable ruling within typical timelines.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count.

A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count.

The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
音量
$425
マーケット開始日
Jun 8, 2026, 5:35 PM ET

Resolver

0x65070BE91...
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

外部リンクに注意してください。

よくある質問

「ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？」はPolymarket上の2個の結果が可能な予測市場で、トレーダーが何が起こるかに基づいてシェアを売買します。現在のリード結果は「ロサンゼルス市長選：第1回投票は不正と裁判所が判断？」で7%です。価格はコミュニティのリアルタイム確率を反映しています。例えば、7¢で取引されているシェアは、市場がその結果に7%の確率を集合的に割り当てていることを意味します。これらのオッズは継続的に変化します。正しい結果のシェアは市場決済時に各$1で引き換え可能です。

「ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？」はPolymarket上で新しく作成された市場です（Jun 8, 2026開始）。早期の市場として、最初のトレーダーの一人としてオッズを設定し、市場の初期価格シグナルを確立するチャンスです。このページをブックマークして、取引量と活動を追跡することもできます。

「ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？」で取引するには、このページに記載されている2個の利用可能な結果を閲覧します。各結果には市場の暗示確率を表す現在の価格が表示されています。ポジションを取るには、最も可能性が高いと思う結果を選び、「はい」で支持するか「いいえ」で反対するかを選択し、金額を入力して「取引」をクリックします。選んだ結果が市場決済時に正しければ、「はい」のシェアは各$1を支払います。正しくなければ$0です。決済前にいつでもシェアを売却できます。

これは非常に拮抗した市場です。「ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？」の現在のリーダーは「ロサンゼルス市長選：第1回投票は不正と裁判所が判断？」でわずか7%です。どの結果も強い多数派を占めていないため、トレーダーはこれを非常に不確実と見ており、独自の取引機会を提供する可能性があります。これらのオッズはリアルタイムで更新されますので、このページをブックマークしてください。

「ロサンゼルス市長選挙：裁判所判決第1ラウンドは不正ですか？」の決済ルールは、各結果が勝者と宣言されるために何が起こる必要があるかを正確に定義しています。これには結果を決定するために使用される公式データソースも含まれます。このページのコメント上にある「ルール」セクションで完全な決済基準を確認できます。取引前にルールを注意深く読むことをお勧めします。