James Wade enters the Australian Darts Masters quarter-final against Stephen Bunting after a standout 6-0 opening win over Tim Pusey, posting a 112.73 average with four 180s and a 164 checkout—the second-highest recorded in the event. Bunting advanced more routinely with a 6-3 victory. The closely matched implied probabilities reflect both players’ proven PDC pedigrees, strong head-to-head history, and capacity for high three-dart averages in best-of-11-leg formats. Wade’s current scoring momentum and finishing reliability provide the narrow consensus edge, yet Bunting’s consistency and experience in World Series events keep the contest balanced. Developments such as sustained checkout percentages, 180 frequency, or any short-turnaround fatigue from the Australian schedule could shift sentiment ahead of the match.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоWade
Wade
This market will resolve to 'Wade' if James Wade wins against Stephen Bunting.
This market will resolve to 'Bunting' if Stephen Bunting wins against James Wade.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve 50-50.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Ринок відкрито: Aug 21, 2026, 10:02 AM ET
Джерело вирішення
https://www.pdc.tv/Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to 'Wade' if James Wade wins against Stephen Bunting.
This market will resolve to 'Bunting' if Stephen Bunting wins against James Wade.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve 50-50.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Джерело вирішення
https://www.pdc.tv/Resolver
0x65070BE91...James Wade enters the Australian Darts Masters quarter-final against Stephen Bunting after a standout 6-0 opening win over Tim Pusey, posting a 112.73 average with four 180s and a 164 checkout—the second-highest recorded in the event. Bunting advanced more routinely with a 6-3 victory. The closely matched implied probabilities reflect both players’ proven PDC pedigrees, strong head-to-head history, and capacity for high three-dart averages in best-of-11-leg formats. Wade’s current scoring momentum and finishing reliability provide the narrow consensus edge, yet Bunting’s consistency and experience in World Series events keep the contest balanced. Developments such as sustained checkout percentages, 180 frequency, or any short-turnaround fatigue from the Australian schedule could shift sentiment ahead of the match.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання