Recent leaderboard results on Text Arena math benchmarks show Google’s Gemini 4 series, including Argon and Carbon variants, holding the top spot with Elo-style scores around 1522–1544, while Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5 models cluster immediately behind at 1507–1532. This narrow gap, combined with Anthropic’s consistent depth across multiple high-performing releases, underpins the 53.5% market-implied odds for Anthropic as second-best lab by end of December. Google’s 28.5% reflects its current lead but also the risk of slippage if Anthropic ships further refinements. Lower odds for OpenAI, Meta, and Chinese labs align with their trailing arena scores and slower recent math-specific gains. Traders are watching December model updates and any new benchmark votes that could shift these tight margins.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于1H6H1D7D30DALL
View resolved






















警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题