President Donald Trump maintains a consistent record of incorporating pointed personal language into public statements, press interactions, and Truth Social posts, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or institutional conditions. In mid-May 2026, recent remarks have included criticisms of White House facilities during discussions of renovation projects and direct comments on reporters during question-and-answer sessions, aligning with patterns observed across prior weeks. These exchanges frequently occur amid policy debates, diplomatic updates, or campaign-related commentary, with traders monitoring daily output for resolution triggers such as nicknames, competence assessments, or loyalty references. Scheduled events including White House briefings, international engagements, and social media activity through late May could sustain the pace of such statements, though purely policy-focused remarks without personal disparagement would not affect outcomes.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$484,666 交易量
2026-05-31
May 17
89%
May 18
90%
May 19
93%
May 20
91%
May 21
90%
May 22
94%
May 23
90%
May 24
89%
May 25
88%
May 26
88%
May 27
86%
May 28
89%
May 29
88%
May 30
91%
May 31
89%
$484,666 交易量
May 17
$11,079 交易量
89%
May 18
$2,804 交易量
90%
May 19
$1,609 交易量
93%
May 20
$1,070 交易量
91%
May 21
$474 交易量
90%
May 22
$907 交易量
94%
May 23
$104 交易量
90%
May 24
$433 交易量
89%
May 25
$620 交易量
88%
May 26
$692 交易量
88%
May 27
$1,014 交易量
86%
May 28
$501 交易量
89%
May 29
$382 交易量
88%
May 30
$96 交易量
91%
May 31
$369 交易量
89%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains a consistent record of incorporating pointed personal language into public statements, press interactions, and Truth Social posts, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or institutional conditions. In mid-May 2026, recent remarks have included criticisms of White House facilities during discussions of renovation projects and direct comments on reporters during question-and-answer sessions, aligning with patterns observed across prior weeks. These exchanges frequently occur amid policy debates, diplomatic updates, or campaign-related commentary, with traders monitoring daily output for resolution triggers such as nicknames, competence assessments, or loyalty references. Scheduled events including White House briefings, international engagements, and social media activity through late May could sustain the pace of such statements, though purely policy-focused remarks without personal disparagement would not affect outcomes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
交易量
$484,666结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump maintains a consistent record of incorporating pointed personal language into public statements, press interactions, and Truth Social posts, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or institutional conditions. In mid-May 2026, recent remarks have included criticisms of White House facilities during discussions of renovation projects and direct comments on reporters during question-and-answer sessions, aligning with patterns observed across prior weeks. These exchanges frequently occur amid policy debates, diplomatic updates, or campaign-related commentary, with traders monitoring daily output for resolution triggers such as nicknames, competence assessments, or loyalty references. Scheduled events including White House briefings, international engagements, and social media activity through late May could sustain the pace of such statements, though purely policy-focused remarks without personal disparagement would not affect outcomes.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$484,666结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump maintains a consistent record of incorporating pointed personal language into public statements, press interactions, and Truth Social posts, often targeting political opponents, media figures, or institutional conditions. In mid-May 2026, recent remarks have included criticisms of White House facilities during discussions of renovation projects and direct comments on reporters during question-and-answer sessions, aligning with patterns observed across prior weeks. These exchanges frequently occur amid policy debates, diplomatic updates, or campaign-related commentary, with traders monitoring daily output for resolution triggers such as nicknames, competence assessments, or loyalty references. Scheduled events including White House briefings, international engagements, and social media activity through late May could sustain the pace of such statements, though purely policy-focused remarks without personal disparagement would not affect outcomes.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题