With the May 15 resolution deadline less than 24 hours away, traders' 99.5% consensus on "No" reflects President Trump's silence on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman over the past 30 days, amid US-Saudi coordination on Iran strikes, oil production via OPEC, and arms deals. A March 27 conference remark—Trump crudely stating MBS "didn't think he'd be kissing my ass" but now "has to be nice"—drew Saudi retaliation like halted US weapons purchases, yet no verified follow-up insults have materialized, per public statements and social media. Strategic alliance needs during the Iran conflict outweigh provocations; only a last-minute Truth Social post, interview, or diplomatic rupture could shift this near-certain outcome.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · AktualisiertWill Trump insult MBS by May 15?
Will Trump insult MBS by May 15?
$23,176 Vol.
$23,176 Vol.
$23,176 Vol.
$23,176 Vol.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: May 7, 2026, 2:01 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...With the May 15 resolution deadline less than 24 hours away, traders' 99.5% consensus on "No" reflects President Trump's silence on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman over the past 30 days, amid US-Saudi coordination on Iran strikes, oil production via OPEC, and arms deals. A March 27 conference remark—Trump crudely stating MBS "didn't think he'd be kissing my ass" but now "has to be nice"—drew Saudi retaliation like halted US weapons purchases, yet no verified follow-up insults have materialized, per public statements and social media. Strategic alliance needs during the Iran conflict outweigh provocations; only a last-minute Truth Social post, interview, or diplomatic rupture could shift this near-certain outcome.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen