Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a modest edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens, as reflected in trader pricing. Recent August polling shows Earls ahead by low single digits among likely voters in a state with narrow partisan divides, while her campaign maintains a substantial fundraising lead exceeding $3 million in cash on hand compared to Stevens’ roughly $250,000. Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full time on the race, emphasizing her legislative record and private law practice. The outcome could influence the court’s 5-2 Republican majority, though structural factors such as incumbency and statewide turnout patterns continue to keep the contest competitive ahead of Election Day.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoNorth Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
North Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
NOWE
NOWE
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
68%
Sarah Stevens (R)
36%
NOWE
NOWE
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
$30 Wol.
68%
Sarah Stevens (R)
$0 Wol.
36%
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a modest edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens, as reflected in trader pricing. Recent August polling shows Earls ahead by low single digits among likely voters in a state with narrow partisan divides, while her campaign maintains a substantial fundraising lead exceeding $3 million in cash on hand compared to Stevens’ roughly $250,000. Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full time on the race, emphasizing her legislative record and private law practice. The outcome could influence the court’s 5-2 Republican majority, though structural factors such as incumbency and statewide turnout patterns continue to keep the contest competitive ahead of Election Day.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Rynek otwarty: Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ET
Wolumen
$30Data zakończenia
Nov 4, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a modest edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens, as reflected in trader pricing. Recent August polling shows Earls ahead by low single digits among likely voters in a state with narrow partisan divides, while her campaign maintains a substantial fundraising lead exceeding $3 million in cash on hand compared to Stevens’ roughly $250,000. Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full time on the race, emphasizing her legislative record and private law practice. The outcome could influence the court’s 5-2 Republican majority, though structural factors such as incumbency and statewide turnout patterns continue to keep the contest competitive ahead of Election Day.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Wolumen
$30Data zakończenia
Nov 4, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls holds a modest edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for North Carolina Supreme Court Seat 1 against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens, as reflected in trader pricing. Recent August polling shows Earls ahead by low single digits among likely voters in a state with narrow partisan divides, while her campaign maintains a substantial fundraising lead exceeding $3 million in cash on hand compared to Stevens’ roughly $250,000. Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full time on the race, emphasizing her legislative record and private law practice. The outcome could influence the court’s 5-2 Republican majority, though structural factors such as incumbency and statewide turnout patterns continue to keep the contest competitive ahead of Election Day.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania