The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell on April 27, 2026, examining whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims against Roundup labels when the Environmental Protection Agency has not required a cancer warning. The Trump administration filed a brief supporting preemption and uniformity of federal labeling standards, reversing the prior administration’s position. Justices questioned counsel on express and implied preemption under FIFRA’s uniformity provision, with a decision expected by early July. Traders’ 87 percent consensus on a ruling favoring Monsanto reflects the Court’s historical deference to federal regulatory schemes in product-liability cases and the breadth of supporting amicus briefs from business, agricultural, and government groups. A ruling against preemption could preserve thousands of ongoing state lawsuits.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于SCOTUS规则有利于孟山都？
SCOTUS规则有利于孟山都？
是
最新
最新
2026-12-31
是
最新
最新
2026-12-31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, rules that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell on April 27, 2026, examining whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims against Roundup labels when the Environmental Protection Agency has not required a cancer warning. The Trump administration filed a brief supporting preemption and uniformity of federal labeling standards, reversing the prior administration’s position. Justices questioned counsel on express and implied preemption under FIFRA’s uniformity provision, with a decision expected by early July. Traders’ 87 percent consensus on a ruling favoring Monsanto reflects the Court’s historical deference to federal regulatory schemes in product-liability cases and the breadth of supporting amicus briefs from business, agricultural, and government groups. A ruling against preemption could preserve thousands of ongoing state lawsuits.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, rules that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市场开放时间： Apr 9, 2026, 5:07 PM ET
交易量
$207结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Apr 9, 2026, 5:07 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, rules that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell on April 27, 2026, examining whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims against Roundup labels when the Environmental Protection Agency has not required a cancer warning. The Trump administration filed a brief supporting preemption and uniformity of federal labeling standards, reversing the prior administration’s position. Justices questioned counsel on express and implied preemption under FIFRA’s uniformity provision, with a decision expected by early July. Traders’ 87 percent consensus on a ruling favoring Monsanto reflects the Court’s historical deference to federal regulatory schemes in product-liability cases and the breadth of supporting amicus briefs from business, agricultural, and government groups. A ruling against preemption could preserve thousands of ongoing state lawsuits.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, rules that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The Supreme Court will be considered to rule that FIFRA preempts such claims if it issues a decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell holding that FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims, including ruling that manufacturers cannot be held liable under state law for failing to include warnings not required or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If the Supreme Court ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell affirms that state-law failure-to-warn claims are not preempted, allows such claims to proceed, or otherwise declines to find federal preemption, the market will resolve to “No”. If the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
交易量
$207结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Apr 9, 2026, 5:07 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell on April 27, 2026, examining whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state failure-to-warn claims against Roundup labels when the Environmental Protection Agency has not required a cancer warning. The Trump administration filed a brief supporting preemption and uniformity of federal labeling standards, reversing the prior administration’s position. Justices questioned counsel on express and implied preemption under FIFRA’s uniformity provision, with a decision expected by early July. Traders’ 87 percent consensus on a ruling favoring Monsanto reflects the Court’s historical deference to federal regulatory schemes in product-liability cases and the breadth of supporting amicus briefs from business, agricultural, and government groups. A ruling against preemption could preserve thousands of ongoing state lawsuits.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题