The Supreme Court’s March 2026 oral arguments in *Watson v. Republican National Committee* showed a clear majority of justices skeptical of state laws permitting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received days later. Challengers, including the RNC, contend that the 1845 federal statute setting a uniform Election Day requires ballots to be received—not merely cast—by that date, preempting grace periods in roughly 15 states and D.C. Lower-court precedent and questions from conservative justices during argument reinforced expectations of a ruling striking down Mississippi’s five-day receipt window, with a decision anticipated by late June. Traders have priced this procedural and jurisprudential trajectory into the 73.5% implied probability for a bar on post-Election Day counting.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于SCOTUS bars counting mail ballots after election day?
SCOTUS bars counting mail ballots after election day?
$41,189 交易量
$41,189 交易量
2026-08-01
$41,189 交易量
$41,189 交易量
2026-08-01
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in Watson v. Republican National Committee, rules that the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots cast by federal Election Day to be received and counted after election day, by August 1, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.The Supreme Court’s March 2026 oral arguments in *Watson v. Republican National Committee* showed a clear majority of justices skeptical of state laws permitting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received days later. Challengers, including the RNC, contend that the 1845 federal statute setting a uniform Election Day requires ballots to be received—not merely cast—by that date, preempting grace periods in roughly 15 states and D.C. Lower-court precedent and questions from conservative justices during argument reinforced expectations of a ruling striking down Mississippi’s five-day receipt window, with a decision anticipated by late June. Traders have priced this procedural and jurisprudential trajectory into the 73.5% implied probability for a bar on post-Election Day counting.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in Watson v. Republican National Committee, rules that the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots cast by federal Election Day to be received and counted after election day, by August 1, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市场开放时间： Mar 24, 2026, 7:31 PM ET
交易量
$41,189结束日期
2026-08-01市场开放时间
Mar 24, 2026, 7:31 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in Watson v. Republican National Committee, rules that the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots cast by federal Election Day to be received and counted after election day, by August 1, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.The Supreme Court’s March 2026 oral arguments in *Watson v. Republican National Committee* showed a clear majority of justices skeptical of state laws permitting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received days later. Challengers, including the RNC, contend that the 1845 federal statute setting a uniform Election Day requires ballots to be received—not merely cast—by that date, preempting grace periods in roughly 15 states and D.C. Lower-court precedent and questions from conservative justices during argument reinforced expectations of a ruling striking down Mississippi’s five-day receipt window, with a decision anticipated by late June. Traders have priced this procedural and jurisprudential trajectory into the 73.5% implied probability for a bar on post-Election Day counting.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in Watson v. Republican National Committee, rules that the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots cast by federal Election Day to be received and counted after election day, by August 1, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
交易量
$41,189结束日期
2026-08-01市场开放时间
Mar 24, 2026, 7:31 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court’s March 2026 oral arguments in *Watson v. Republican National Committee* showed a clear majority of justices skeptical of state laws permitting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received days later. Challengers, including the RNC, contend that the 1845 federal statute setting a uniform Election Day requires ballots to be received—not merely cast—by that date, preempting grace periods in roughly 15 states and D.C. Lower-court precedent and questions from conservative justices during argument reinforced expectations of a ruling striking down Mississippi’s five-day receipt window, with a decision anticipated by late June. Traders have priced this procedural and jurisprudential trajectory into the 73.5% implied probability for a bar on post-Election Day counting.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题