Traders assign a 90.5% implied probability that sports prediction markets will avoid formal gambling classification for CFTC-regulated event contracts through April 2027, driven primarily by the IRS's continued lack of published guidance on tax treatment as of mid-September 2026. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a 90% wagering-loss deduction cap effective 2026, yet federal authorities have issued no revenue rulings or notices addressing whether sports-outcome contracts fall under Section 165(d) or qualify for capital-gains or Section 1256 frameworks. Recent circuit splits in federal appeals courts, including Third Circuit support for swap classification versus Ninth Circuit deference to state gambling laws, underscore the unresolved regulatory matchup without tipping toward immediate IRS action. Ongoing state challenges and proposed regulations have not produced the formal classification needed to resolve the market affirmatively, leaving the no-outcome favored by the wisdom of crowds in current pricing.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено$44,344 Объем
$44,344 Объем
$44,344 Объем
$44,344 Объем
For purposes of this market, sports event contracts are contracts whose payoff is determined by the outcome, score, or statistical result of an athletic competition listed on a CFTC-designated contract market or swap execution facility.
Qualifying guidance must be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or the Federal Register as a Revenue Ruling, Revenue Procedure, IRS Notice, IRS Announcement, final or temporary Treasury Regulation, or proposed Treasury Regulation that remains published without withdrawal for at least 30 calendar days after its Federal Register publication date. Guidance qualifies if it expressly applies Section 165(d) to such contracts or classifies them as wagering transactions for federal income tax purposes. Guidance classifying sports event contracts as wagering solely for purposes of Section 4401, Section 6041, Section 3402(q), or other Code sections that do not bear on the deductibility of losses does not qualify. Non-qualifying actions include Private Letter Rulings, Chief Counsel Advice, Tax Court decisions, IRS official statements, Congressional testimony, and web-based publications not appearing in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Federal Register. A final and non-appealable decision of the U.S. Supreme Court holding that CFTC-regulated sports event contracts are subject to Section 165(d) also qualifies for resolution.
This market will resolve to "No" if qualifying guidance is withdrawn, modified into non-qualifying form, or superseded by non-qualifying guidance before April 15, 2027; if federal legislation repeals Section 165(d) or exempts CFTC-regulated sports event contracts from its application; if federal legislation establishes a tax treatment for sports event contracts incompatible with Section 165(d) prior to qualifying guidance being issued; or if the CFTC prohibits the listing of sports event contracts on all CFTC-designated contract markets before any qualifying guidance is issued.
The resolution source for this market is the Internal Revenue Bulletin (irs.gov/irb) and the Federal Register (federalregister.gov).
Открытие рынка: Jun 1, 2026, 1:47 PM ET
Кто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...For purposes of this market, sports event contracts are contracts whose payoff is determined by the outcome, score, or statistical result of an athletic competition listed on a CFTC-designated contract market or swap execution facility.
Qualifying guidance must be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or the Federal Register as a Revenue Ruling, Revenue Procedure, IRS Notice, IRS Announcement, final or temporary Treasury Regulation, or proposed Treasury Regulation that remains published without withdrawal for at least 30 calendar days after its Federal Register publication date. Guidance qualifies if it expressly applies Section 165(d) to such contracts or classifies them as wagering transactions for federal income tax purposes. Guidance classifying sports event contracts as wagering solely for purposes of Section 4401, Section 6041, Section 3402(q), or other Code sections that do not bear on the deductibility of losses does not qualify. Non-qualifying actions include Private Letter Rulings, Chief Counsel Advice, Tax Court decisions, IRS official statements, Congressional testimony, and web-based publications not appearing in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or Federal Register. A final and non-appealable decision of the U.S. Supreme Court holding that CFTC-regulated sports event contracts are subject to Section 165(d) also qualifies for resolution.
This market will resolve to "No" if qualifying guidance is withdrawn, modified into non-qualifying form, or superseded by non-qualifying guidance before April 15, 2027; if federal legislation repeals Section 165(d) or exempts CFTC-regulated sports event contracts from its application; if federal legislation establishes a tax treatment for sports event contracts incompatible with Section 165(d) prior to qualifying guidance being issued; or if the CFTC prohibits the listing of sports event contracts on all CFTC-designated contract markets before any qualifying guidance is issued.
The resolution source for this market is the Internal Revenue Bulletin (irs.gov/irb) and the Federal Register (federalregister.gov).
Кто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...Traders assign a 90.5% implied probability that sports prediction markets will avoid formal gambling classification for CFTC-regulated event contracts through April 2027, driven primarily by the IRS's continued lack of published guidance on tax treatment as of mid-September 2026. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a 90% wagering-loss deduction cap effective 2026, yet federal authorities have issued no revenue rulings or notices addressing whether sports-outcome contracts fall under Section 165(d) or qualify for capital-gains or Section 1256 frameworks. Recent circuit splits in federal appeals courts, including Third Circuit support for swap classification versus Ninth Circuit deference to state gambling laws, underscore the unresolved regulatory matchup without tipping toward immediate IRS action. Ongoing state challenges and proposed regulations have not produced the formal classification needed to resolve the market affirmatively, leaving the no-outcome favored by the wisdom of crowds in current pricing.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено

Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы