Anthropic leads trader sentiment at 58.5% implied probability for the top LiveBench Coding score by end of October, driven by consistent strength in Claude models' code generation, debugging, and complex reasoning tasks that have outperformed rivals on recent benchmark iterations. OpenAI sits at 29% as its latest releases close the gap in agentic coding workflows but trail in raw accuracy on LiveBench's dynamic tests. Competitive dynamics hinge on rapid iteration cycles among frontier labs, where factors like training data quality, reinforcement learning from code feedback, and inference optimizations differentiate leaders. Most other providers remain below 3% due to narrower capability gaps on public evals. Key catalysts ahead include potential model updates or new benchmark refreshes before October that could shift relative rankings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоКакая компания имеет лучшую модель ИИ на LiveBench (Coding) в конце октября?
Anthropic 59%
OpenAI 29%
Meta 2.4%
Google 2.0%

Anthropic
59%

OpenAI
29%

Meta
2%

2%

Mistral
2%

DeepSeek
2%

Baidu
1%

Xiaomi
1%

Amazon
1%

Nvidia
1%

Thinky
1%

MiniMax
1%

Meituan
<1%

Tencent
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%
Anthropic 59%
OpenAI 29%
Meta 2.4%
Google 2.0%

Anthropic
59%

OpenAI
29%

Meta
2%

2%

Mistral
2%

DeepSeek
2%

Baidu
1%

Xiaomi
1%

Amazon
1%

Nvidia
1%

Thinky
1%

MiniMax
1%

Meituan
<1%

Tencent
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Открытие рынка: Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic leads trader sentiment at 58.5% implied probability for the top LiveBench Coding score by end of October, driven by consistent strength in Claude models' code generation, debugging, and complex reasoning tasks that have outperformed rivals on recent benchmark iterations. OpenAI sits at 29% as its latest releases close the gap in agentic coding workflows but trail in raw accuracy on LiveBench's dynamic tests. Competitive dynamics hinge on rapid iteration cycles among frontier labs, where factors like training data quality, reinforcement learning from code feedback, and inference optimizations differentiate leaders. Most other providers remain below 3% due to narrower capability gaps on public evals. Key catalysts ahead include potential model updates or new benchmark refreshes before October that could shift relative rankings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы