Anthropic holds the clearest edge in trader sentiment for the LiveBench coding category at end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and related variants posting the highest scores on the June 2026 LiveBench release, including an 86.0 coding mark ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol. Recent benchmark data across LiveBench, SWE-bench Verified, and agentic coding tasks show Anthropic models maintaining consistent leads in complex code generation and reasoning, reflecting strong post-training refinements that translate directly to contamination-free evaluations. OpenAI and other frontier labs remain competitive through rapid iteration cycles, but the gap in demonstrated LiveBench performance and developer preference for Claude-style outputs supports the current market-implied odds. Key upcoming catalysts include any September or October model drops or fine-tunes that could shift the leaderboard before the next LiveBench refresh.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วAnthropic 59%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 3.3%
Mistral 2.7%
ใหม่
ใหม่
Oct 31, 2026
Anthropic
59%
OpenAI
30%
DeepSeek
3%
Mistral
3%
Meta
2%
2%
Amazon
1%
Nvidia
1%
Thinky
1%
MiniMax
1%
Baidu
1%
Xiaomi
1%
Meituan
<1%
Tencent
<1%
Microsoft
<1%
StepFun
<1%
Z.ai
<1%
SpaceXAI
<1%
ByteDance
<1%
Alibaba
<1%
Moonshot
<1%
Anthropic 59%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 3.3%
Mistral 2.7%
ใหม่
ใหม่
Oct 31, 2026
Anthropic
$3,985 ปริมาณ
59%
OpenAI
$485 ปริมาณ
30%
DeepSeek
$113 ปริมาณ
3%
Mistral
$165 ปริมาณ
3%
Meta
$160 ปริมาณ
2%
$138 ปริมาณ
2%
Amazon
$174 ปริมาณ
1%
Nvidia
$179 ปริมาณ
1%
Thinky
$179 ปริมาณ
1%
MiniMax
$164 ปริมาณ
1%
Baidu
$144 ปริมาณ
1%
Xiaomi
$182 ปริมาณ
1%
Meituan
$113 ปริมาณ
<1%
Tencent
$134 ปริมาณ
<1%
Microsoft
$186 ปริมาณ
<1%
StepFun
$138 ปริมาณ
<1%
Z.ai
$151 ปริมาณ
<1%
SpaceXAI
$146 ปริมาณ
<1%
ByteDance
$133 ปริมาณ
<1%
Alibaba
$133 ปริมาณ
<1%
Moonshot
$153 ปริมาณ
<1%
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Coding score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on October 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic holds the clearest edge in trader sentiment for the LiveBench coding category at end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and related variants posting the highest scores on the June 2026 LiveBench release, including an 86.0 coding mark ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol. Recent benchmark data across LiveBench, SWE-bench Verified, and agentic coding tasks show Anthropic models maintaining consistent leads in complex code generation and reasoning, reflecting strong post-training refinements that translate directly to contamination-free evaluations. OpenAI and other frontier labs remain competitive through rapid iteration cycles, but the gap in demonstrated LiveBench performance and developer preference for Claude-style outputs supports the current market-implied odds. Key upcoming catalysts include any September or October model drops or fine-tunes that could shift the leaderboard before the next LiveBench refresh.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Coding score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on October 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$7,350วันสิ้นสุด
Oct 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ETResolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Coding score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on October 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”Anthropic holds the clearest edge in trader sentiment for the LiveBench coding category at end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and related variants posting the highest scores on the June 2026 LiveBench release, including an 86.0 coding mark ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol. Recent benchmark data across LiveBench, SWE-bench Verified, and agentic coding tasks show Anthropic models maintaining consistent leads in complex code generation and reasoning, reflecting strong post-training refinements that translate directly to contamination-free evaluations. OpenAI and other frontier labs remain competitive through rapid iteration cycles, but the gap in demonstrated LiveBench performance and developer preference for Claude-style outputs supports the current market-implied odds. Key upcoming catalysts include any September or October model drops or fine-tunes that could shift the leaderboard before the next LiveBench refresh.
This market will resolve according to the company which owns the model with the highest Coding score on LiveBench.ai when the leaderboard is checked on October 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$7,350วันสิ้นสุด
Oct 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ETResolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic holds the clearest edge in trader sentiment for the LiveBench coding category at end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5 and related variants posting the highest scores on the June 2026 LiveBench release, including an 86.0 coding mark ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol. Recent benchmark data across LiveBench, SWE-bench Verified, and agentic coding tasks show Anthropic models maintaining consistent leads in complex code generation and reasoning, reflecting strong post-training refinements that translate directly to contamination-free evaluations. OpenAI and other frontier labs remain competitive through rapid iteration cycles, but the gap in demonstrated LiveBench performance and developer preference for Claude-style outputs supports the current market-implied odds. Key upcoming catalysts include any September or October model drops or fine-tunes that could shift the leaderboard before the next LiveBench refresh.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย