The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于是
$21,423 交易量
$21,423 交易量
2026-12-31
是
$21,423 交易量
$21,423 交易量
2026-12-31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter, rules to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter, rules to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市场开放时间： Jan 20, 2026, 10:54 AM ET
交易量
$21,423结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Jan 20, 2026, 10:54 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter, rules to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter, rules to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
The Supreme Court will be considered to overturn Humphrey's Executor v. United States if they issue a decision in Trump v. Slaughter overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935), including ruling that the President may remove FTC commissioners at will.
If the Supreme court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter affirms that for-cause removal protections for FTC commissioners remain constitutional or if the case is dismissed, settled, or otherwise disposed of without a merits decision within this market’s timeframe, the market will resolve to “No”. If no Supreme Court ruling on the merits of Trump v. Slaughter is issued by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
交易量
$21,423结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Jan 20, 2026, 10:54 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court’s December 2025 oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter centered on whether statutory “for cause” removal protections for Federal Trade Commission commissioners violate separation of powers. A conservative majority questioned the continued validity of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, signaling willingness to limit or overturn it and affirm broader presidential authority over independent agencies. The Court had already issued a stay permitting the March 2025 removal of Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand pending resolution. With a decision expected before the end of the October 2025 term, traders view the justices’ skeptical tone toward agency independence as the primary driver behind the 81.7 percent implied probability that the Court will uphold the firing authority.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题