President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct, personal criticism during media appearances continues to shape trader expectations for daily markets on whether he will publicly insult someone. In recent days, he ended a “Meet the Press” interview after labeling host Kristen Welker and her network “crooked” or “stupid,” and he told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins she had “hatred in her eyes” and never smiled. Similar exchanges with other journalists have featured terms such as “dumb” or accusations of bias. These interactions occur amid ongoing coverage of elections, policy disputes, and foreign policy tensions, providing frequent opportunities for on-camera or social-media remarks. Historical frequency of such statements during his current term supports the elevated implied probability reflected in active Polymarket contracts.
Eksperimental na AI-generated summary na nire-reference ang Polymarket data. Hindi ito trading advice at wala itong papel sa kung paano nire-resolve ang market na ito. · Na-update$448,794 Vol.
Jun 30, 2026
June 18
94%
June 25
93%
June 27
93%
June 10
96%
June 11
94%
June 12
93%
June 13
93%
June 14
93%
June 15
92%
June 16
92%
June 17
93%
June 19
93%
June 20
92%
June 21
92%
June 22
92%
June 23
92%
June 24
92%
June 26
92%
June 28
93%
June 29
92%
June 30
92%
$448,794 Vol.
June 18
$1,535 Vol.
94%
June 25
$145 Vol.
93%
June 27
$150 Vol.
93%
June 10
$12,855 Vol.
96%
June 11
$4,022 Vol.
94%
June 12
$3,480 Vol.
93%
June 13
$1,660 Vol.
93%
June 14
$1,406 Vol.
93%
June 15
$2,835 Vol.
92%
June 16
$284 Vol.
92%
June 17
$813 Vol.
93%
June 19
$232 Vol.
93%
June 20
$190 Vol.
92%
June 21
$2,235 Vol.
92%
June 22
$322 Vol.
92%
June 23
$149 Vol.
92%
June 24
$179 Vol.
92%
June 26
$207 Vol.
92%
June 28
$768 Vol.
93%
June 29
$1,328 Vol.
92%
June 30
$173 Vol.
92%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct, personal criticism during media appearances continues to shape trader expectations for daily markets on whether he will publicly insult someone. In recent days, he ended a “Meet the Press” interview after labeling host Kristen Welker and her network “crooked” or “stupid,” and he told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins she had “hatred in her eyes” and never smiled. Similar exchanges with other journalists have featured terms such as “dumb” or accusations of bias. These interactions occur amid ongoing coverage of elections, policy disputes, and foreign policy tensions, providing frequent opportunities for on-camera or social-media remarks. Historical frequency of such statements during his current term supports the elevated implied probability reflected in active Polymarket contracts.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Binuksan ang Market: Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ET
Volume
$448,794Petsa ng Pagtatapos
Jun 30, 2026Binuksan ang Market
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct, personal criticism during media appearances continues to shape trader expectations for daily markets on whether he will publicly insult someone. In recent days, he ended a “Meet the Press” interview after labeling host Kristen Welker and her network “crooked” or “stupid,” and he told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins she had “hatred in her eyes” and never smiled. Similar exchanges with other journalists have featured terms such as “dumb” or accusations of bias. These interactions occur amid ongoing coverage of elections, policy disputes, and foreign policy tensions, providing frequent opportunities for on-camera or social-media remarks. Historical frequency of such statements during his current term supports the elevated implied probability reflected in active Polymarket contracts.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$448,794Petsa ng Pagtatapos
Jun 30, 2026Binuksan ang Market
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct, personal criticism during media appearances continues to shape trader expectations for daily markets on whether he will publicly insult someone. In recent days, he ended a “Meet the Press” interview after labeling host Kristen Welker and her network “crooked” or “stupid,” and he told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins she had “hatred in her eyes” and never smiled. Similar exchanges with other journalists have featured terms such as “dumb” or accusations of bias. These interactions occur amid ongoing coverage of elections, policy disputes, and foreign policy tensions, providing frequent opportunities for on-camera or social-media remarks. Historical frequency of such statements during his current term supports the elevated implied probability reflected in active Polymarket contracts.
Eksperimental na AI-generated summary na nire-reference ang Polymarket data. Hindi ito trading advice at wala itong papel sa kung paano nire-resolve ang market na ito. · Na-update
Mag-ingat sa mga external link.
Mag-ingat sa mga external link.
Mga Madalas na Tanong