Anthropic's Claude models maintain overwhelming trader consensus at 94.5% implied probability for the best coding AI by end of June, driven by repeated leadership on SWE-Bench Verified and related benchmarks, where recent variants have posted scores above 88% and occasionally near 95%—well ahead of OpenAI's GPT series. Developers consistently highlight Claude's strengths in complex reasoning, large codebase navigation, multi-file refactoring, and reliable agentic workflows, reinforced by targeted releases like Sonnet 4.5 and subsequent Opus iterations optimized for production coding. OpenAI trails at 4.5% due to narrower gaps on speed-focused tasks but lower verified performance overall. A last-minute competitor model launch or benchmark methodology shift could still alter positioning before resolution, though current momentum favors sustained Anthropic dominance.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoQuale azienda ha il miglior modello di Coding AI alla fine di giugno?
Anthropic 95%
OpenAI 4.5%
Z.ai <1%
Google <1%
$49,557 Vol.
$49,557 Vol.

Anthropic
95%

OpenAI
5%

Z.ai
1%

<1%

xAI
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Meta
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Amazon
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Meituan
<1%
Anthropic 95%
OpenAI 4.5%
Z.ai <1%
Google <1%
$49,557 Vol.
$49,557 Vol.

Anthropic
95%

OpenAI
5%

Z.ai
1%

<1%

xAI
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Meta
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Amazon
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Meituan
<1%
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Mercato aperto: May 26, 2026, 6:37 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic's Claude models maintain overwhelming trader consensus at 94.5% implied probability for the best coding AI by end of June, driven by repeated leadership on SWE-Bench Verified and related benchmarks, where recent variants have posted scores above 88% and occasionally near 95%—well ahead of OpenAI's GPT series. Developers consistently highlight Claude's strengths in complex reasoning, large codebase navigation, multi-file refactoring, and reliable agentic workflows, reinforced by targeted releases like Sonnet 4.5 and subsequent Opus iterations optimized for production coding. OpenAI trails at 4.5% due to narrower gaps on speed-focused tasks but lower verified performance overall. A last-minute competitor model launch or benchmark methodology shift could still alter positioning before resolution, though current momentum favors sustained Anthropic dominance.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti