Recent developments have heightened attention on whether the Supreme Court will grant certiorari in litigation over sports event contracts offered on CFTC-regulated platforms. In late August 2026, the Ninth Circuit ruled against Kalshi in a case involving Nevada, holding that such contracts constitute sports betting subject to state gambling laws rather than swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act, creating a direct split with the Third Circuit’s earlier pro-preemption decision. New Jersey petitioned for Supreme Court review on September 2, followed by a conditional petition from Robinhood, while Kalshi sought Ninth Circuit rehearing en banc. These filings, alongside parallel appeals and state-tribal challenges, position the jurisdictional conflict for potential high-court consideration, though grants typically follow petitions by several months and remain subject to the Court’s discretionary docket. Traders weigh the circuit split and petitions against historical patterns of Supreme Court timing and the possibility of legislative or regulatory resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日No SCOTUS certiorari granted on sports event contract cases by July 31 deadline
By the July 31, 2026 deadline, no public confirmation of Supreme Court certiorari grants on sports event contract cases was made, leading to market price declines for the July 31 outcome and shifting expectations to later dates.
No Supreme Court certiorari granted on sports event contract cases by July 31 deadline
December 31 rises to 34%3%
By the July 31, 2026 deadline, no official Supreme Court docket or credible legal reporting confirmed certiorari grants on cases explicitly concerning sports event contracts, leading to market settling at a low probability of 'Yes'.




外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問