Trader consensus prices a 90% chance that SCOTUS will strike down President Trump's Executive Order 14160 on birthright citizenship, reflecting skepticism voiced by justices during April 1 oral arguments in Barbara v. Trump. Multiple federal district courts issued nationwide injunctions blocking the order—aimed at denying citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants or non-permanent residents—citing longstanding 14th Amendment precedent from cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Appeals courts upheld these blocks, and even Trump predicted a potential adverse ruling. While a conservative majority could reinterpret "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," historical interpretations and questioning during arguments drive the high implied probability of invalidation, pending a decision expected soon amid other looming SCOTUS rulings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоДа
$121,523 Объем
$121,523 Объем
Да
$121,523 Объем
$121,523 Объем
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Открытие рынка: Mar 31, 2026, 2:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus prices a 90% chance that SCOTUS will strike down President Trump's Executive Order 14160 on birthright citizenship, reflecting skepticism voiced by justices during April 1 oral arguments in Barbara v. Trump. Multiple federal district courts issued nationwide injunctions blocking the order—aimed at denying citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants or non-permanent residents—citing longstanding 14th Amendment precedent from cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Appeals courts upheld these blocks, and even Trump predicted a potential adverse ruling. While a conservative majority could reinterpret "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," historical interpretations and questioning during arguments drive the high implied probability of invalidation, pending a decision expected soon amid other looming SCOTUS rulings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы