North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоNorth Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
North Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
НОВЕ
НОВЕ
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
59%
Sarah Stevens (R)
36%
НОВЕ
НОВЕ
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
$0 Обс.
59%
Sarah Stevens (R)
$0 Обс.
36%
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Ринок відкрито: Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ET
Обсяг
$0Дата завершення
Nov 4, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETВирішувач
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Обсяг
$0Дата завершення
Nov 4, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETВирішувач
0x69c47De9D...North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання