Anthropic's recent releases of Claude Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 have driven the 71.5% market-implied odds, as these models currently lead independent composites on coding, reasoning, and agentic benchmarks such as SWE-Bench variants and Terminal-Bench, outperforming OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Google's Gemini 3.x series in several key evaluations. Traders appear to factor in Anthropic's emphasis on reliable tool use and large-context performance, alongside its internal deployment of models for roughly a quarter of R&D work, which signals accelerating capability gains through mid-2026. Google and OpenAI trail at 12.5% and 9.5% respectively due to slightly lower or less consistent scores on the hardest agentic tasks, while smaller labs like xAI and Meta sit under 3% amid limited frontier benchmark presence. Market sentiment reflects skin-in-the-game consensus on current trajectories, though model timelines and evaluation shifts could still alter the outcome by year-end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Anthropic 72%
Google 13%
OpenAI 10%
xAI 3.0%
$1,324,833 交易量
$1,324,833 交易量

Anthropic
72%

13%

OpenAI
10%

xAI
3%

Meta
3%

阿里巴巴
1%

DeepSeek
1%

Moonshot
1%

Z.ai
1%

百度
<1%

字節跳動
<1%

Mistral
<1%

美團
<1%

微軟
<1%

亞馬遜
<1%
Anthropic 72%
Google 13%
OpenAI 10%
xAI 3.0%
$1,324,833 交易量
$1,324,833 交易量

Anthropic
72%

13%

OpenAI
10%

xAI
3%

Meta
3%

阿里巴巴
1%

DeepSeek
1%

Moonshot
1%

Z.ai
1%

百度
<1%

字節跳動
<1%

Mistral
<1%

美團
<1%

微軟
<1%

亞馬遜
<1%
Results from the "Rank" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
市場開放時間: Jun 4, 2026, 1:39 PM ET
Results from the "Rank" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Anthropic's recent releases of Claude Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 have driven the 71.5% market-implied odds, as these models currently lead independent composites on coding, reasoning, and agentic benchmarks such as SWE-Bench variants and Terminal-Bench, outperforming OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Google's Gemini 3.x series in several key evaluations. Traders appear to factor in Anthropic's emphasis on reliable tool use and large-context performance, alongside its internal deployment of models for roughly a quarter of R&D work, which signals accelerating capability gains through mid-2026. Google and OpenAI trail at 12.5% and 9.5% respectively due to slightly lower or less consistent scores on the hardest agentic tasks, while smaller labs like xAI and Meta sit under 3% amid limited frontier benchmark presence. Market sentiment reflects skin-in-the-game consensus on current trajectories, though model timelines and evaluation shifts could still alter the outcome by year-end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於

警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions