Anthropic holds the market lead at 58% implied probability due to its recent Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 releases, which currently top LiveBench's contamination-free coding category with scores around 86%. These models demonstrate strong agentic coding and reasoning capabilities on live tasks, outpacing OpenAI's GPT-5.6 variants that sit near 82% on the same benchmark. With probabilities clustered around 50% for several contenders and OpenAI at 29.5%, traders see a tight race driven by rapid iteration cycles from multiple labs. Key swing factors over the next ten weeks include any new model drops, LiveBench task refreshes, or demonstrated gains in coding-specific benchmarks before the October cutoff, underscoring how quickly frontier large language model performance can shift.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoQuale azienda ha il miglior modello di IA su LiveBench (Coding) alla fine di ottobre?
Anthropic 58%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 4.9%
Xiaomi 4.0%

Anthropic
58%

OpenAI
30%

DeepSeek
5%

Xiaomi
4%

Tencent
4%

Nvidia
3%

Thinky
2%

MiniMax
2%

Mistral
2%

2%

Microsoft
1%

Amazon
1%

Alibaba
1%

Baidu
1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%
Anthropic 58%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 4.9%
Xiaomi 4.0%

Anthropic
58%

OpenAI
30%

DeepSeek
5%

Xiaomi
4%

Tencent
4%

Nvidia
3%

Thinky
2%

MiniMax
2%

Mistral
2%

2%

Microsoft
1%

Amazon
1%

Alibaba
1%

Baidu
1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Mercato aperto: Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic holds the market lead at 58% implied probability due to its recent Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 releases, which currently top LiveBench's contamination-free coding category with scores around 86%. These models demonstrate strong agentic coding and reasoning capabilities on live tasks, outpacing OpenAI's GPT-5.6 variants that sit near 82% on the same benchmark. With probabilities clustered around 50% for several contenders and OpenAI at 29.5%, traders see a tight race driven by rapid iteration cycles from multiple labs. Key swing factors over the next ten weeks include any new model drops, LiveBench task refreshes, or demonstrated gains in coding-specific benchmarks before the October cutoff, underscoring how quickly frontier large language model performance can shift.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti