Anthropic holds a commanding lead in this market because its Claude Opus 4.7 and Mythos Preview models have posted top or near-top scores on recent intelligence and reasoning benchmarks, including strong results in agentic coding and instruction-following that align with style-controlled evaluations. Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro remains competitive through superior multimodal and accuracy metrics on GPQA Diamond and ARC-AGI-2, yet trails in the specific style-control criteria traders are pricing. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released in late April, improved hallucination rates and daily-use performance but has not yet displaced Anthropic on the leaderboard subsets most relevant to this resolution. With the June cutoff approaching, traders appear focused on which lab’s latest large language model will maintain the highest composite ranking once all current frontier releases are fully assessed.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoQuale azienda ha il miglior modello di intelligenza artificiale alla fine di giugno? (Controllo stile attivato)
Anthropic 68%
Google 23%
OpenAI 6%
xAI 2.6%
$1,457,332 Vol.
$1,457,332 Vol.

Anthropic
68%

23%

OpenAI
6%

xAI
3%

DeepSeek
1%

Alibaba
1%

Meta
1%

Z.ai
1%

Microsoft
1%

Moonshot
1%

Meituan
<1%

Mistral
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Amazon
<1%
Anthropic 68%
Google 23%
OpenAI 6%
xAI 2.6%
$1,457,332 Vol.
$1,457,332 Vol.

Anthropic
68%

23%

OpenAI
6%

xAI
3%

DeepSeek
1%

Alibaba
1%

Meta
1%

Z.ai
1%

Microsoft
1%

Moonshot
1%

Meituan
<1%

Mistral
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Amazon
<1%
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with style control on will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolves based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Mercato aperto: Oct 10, 2025, 5:27 PM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with style control on will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolves based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Anthropic holds a commanding lead in this market because its Claude Opus 4.7 and Mythos Preview models have posted top or near-top scores on recent intelligence and reasoning benchmarks, including strong results in agentic coding and instruction-following that align with style-controlled evaluations. Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro remains competitive through superior multimodal and accuracy metrics on GPQA Diamond and ARC-AGI-2, yet trails in the specific style-control criteria traders are pricing. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released in late April, improved hallucination rates and daily-use performance but has not yet displaced Anthropic on the leaderboard subsets most relevant to this resolution. With the June cutoff approaching, traders appear focused on which lab’s latest large language model will maintain the highest composite ranking once all current frontier releases are fully assessed.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti