Following oral arguments on April 1 in Trump v. Barbara, SCOTUS justices expressed widespread skepticism toward President Trump's January 2025 executive order reinterpreting the 14th Amendment to deny birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants or non-permanent residents, driving the 91.8% trader consensus for invalidation. Lower federal courts have repeatedly issued nationwide injunctions deeming the order unconstitutional, citing precedent like United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). While the conservative majority has limited injunction scope in prior rulings, separation-of-powers concerns and textualist readings of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" appear poised to uphold birthright citizenship protections, with a final decision expected by late June.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$121,523 Wol.
$121,523 Wol.
$121,523 Wol.
$121,523 Wol.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Rynek otwarty: Mar 31, 2026, 2:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Following oral arguments on April 1 in Trump v. Barbara, SCOTUS justices expressed widespread skepticism toward President Trump's January 2025 executive order reinterpreting the 14th Amendment to deny birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants or non-permanent residents, driving the 91.8% trader consensus for invalidation. Lower federal courts have repeatedly issued nationwide injunctions deeming the order unconstitutional, citing precedent like United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). While the conservative majority has limited injunction scope in prior rulings, separation-of-powers concerns and textualist readings of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" appear poised to uphold birthright citizenship protections, with a final decision expected by late June.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania