**Ukraine has not reached a binding agreement capping its armed forces at a reduced level, and stalled negotiations make such an outcome before 2027 highly unlikely.** In late 2025, U.S.-brokered drafts of a peace framework included provisions for Ukraine’s peacetime forces to remain at or cap around 800,000 personnel—close to current wartime strength of roughly 880,000–900,000—after Kyiv rejected earlier language limiting the force to 600,000. Ukrainian officials, including President Zelenskyy and Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi, described the 800,000 figure as reflecting existing levels, preserving full mobilization rights and regeneration capacity without permanent restrictions. Russia has continued to press for deeper constraints alongside territorial concessions, but no comprehensive deal incorporating a formal limit has been concluded. Trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi and Geneva in early 2026 ended without breakthrough, and subsequent diplomatic efforts have remained deadlocked over territory, security guarantees, and other core issues. With active hostilities ongoing and less than five months remaining before 2027, traders assign only a 7% chance of any such agreement materializing in time. The 93% probability on “No” reflects the absence of a signed accord, Ukraine’s consistent red lines on defense autonomy, and the lack of near-term progress toward a ceasefire or treaty.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$114,185 Wol.
$114,185 Wol.
$114,185 Wol.
$114,185 Wol.
An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Rynek otwarty: Nov 20, 2025, 6:10 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...**Ukraine has not reached a binding agreement capping its armed forces at a reduced level, and stalled negotiations make such an outcome before 2027 highly unlikely.** In late 2025, U.S.-brokered drafts of a peace framework included provisions for Ukraine’s peacetime forces to remain at or cap around 800,000 personnel—close to current wartime strength of roughly 880,000–900,000—after Kyiv rejected earlier language limiting the force to 600,000. Ukrainian officials, including President Zelenskyy and Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi, described the 800,000 figure as reflecting existing levels, preserving full mobilization rights and regeneration capacity without permanent restrictions. Russia has continued to press for deeper constraints alongside territorial concessions, but no comprehensive deal incorporating a formal limit has been concluded. Trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi and Geneva in early 2026 ended without breakthrough, and subsequent diplomatic efforts have remained deadlocked over territory, security guarantees, and other core issues. With active hostilities ongoing and less than five months remaining before 2027, traders assign only a 7% chance of any such agreement materializing in time. The 93% probability on “No” reflects the absence of a signed accord, Ukraine’s consistent red lines on defense autonomy, and the lack of near-term progress toward a ceasefire or treaty.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano



Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania