President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$106,909 Wol.
May 31, 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
80%
Nicolás Maduro
39%
Freidrich Merz
35%
Tucker Carlson
27%
Megyn Kelly
22%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Kaitlan Collins
17%
Keir Starmer
14%
Alex Jones
13%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
J.D. Vance
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$106,909 Wol.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$2,989 Wol.
80%
Nicolás Maduro
$6,406 Wol.
39%
Freidrich Merz
$1,791 Wol.
35%
Tucker Carlson
$4,451 Wol.
27%
Megyn Kelly
$3,417 Wol.
22%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Wol.
19%
Kaitlan Collins
$262 Wol.
17%
Keir Starmer
$2,925 Wol.
14%
Alex Jones
$87 Wol.
13%
Emmanuel Macron
$583 Wol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Wol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$130 Wol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,436 Wol.
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$452 Wol.
4%
Elon Musk
$1,684 Wol.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Wol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,404 Wol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,687 Wol.
2%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Wol.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Wol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Rynek otwarty: Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
Wolumen
$106,909Data zakończenia
May 31, 2026Rynek otwarty
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Wolumen
$106,909Data zakończenia
May 31, 2026Rynek otwarty
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania