**Trump administration contacts with Alberta separatist groups earlier in 2026, including meetings with the Alberta Prosperity Project, have fueled speculation, yet no public announcement or action has sought U.S. sovereignty or control over Alberta territory.** Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the province as a potential “natural partner” for energy cooperation, while Trump has repeatedly floated broader “51st state” rhetoric toward Canada amid ongoing tariff disputes. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has prioritized energy exports and an October 2026 referendum focused on provincial autonomy rather than U.S. acquisition, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has consistently reaffirmed Canadian sovereignty. State Department clarifications framed the separatist meetings as routine without commitments, and no qualifying territorial claim has emerged. These factors, combined with the absence of concrete steps toward acquisition by year-end, underpin trader consensus favoring “No.”
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว14% โอกาส
ใหม่
ใหม่
Dec 31, 2026
14% โอกาส
ใหม่
ใหม่
Dec 31, 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.**Trump administration contacts with Alberta separatist groups earlier in 2026, including meetings with the Alberta Prosperity Project, have fueled speculation, yet no public announcement or action has sought U.S. sovereignty or control over Alberta territory.** Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the province as a potential “natural partner” for energy cooperation, while Trump has repeatedly floated broader “51st state” rhetoric toward Canada amid ongoing tariff disputes. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has prioritized energy exports and an October 2026 referendum focused on provincial autonomy rather than U.S. acquisition, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has consistently reaffirmed Canadian sovereignty. State Department clarifications framed the separatist meetings as routine without commitments, and no qualifying territorial claim has emerged. These factors, combined with the absence of concrete steps toward acquisition by year-end, underpin trader consensus favoring “No.”
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$3,738วันสิ้นสุด
Dec 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.**Trump administration contacts with Alberta separatist groups earlier in 2026, including meetings with the Alberta Prosperity Project, have fueled speculation, yet no public announcement or action has sought U.S. sovereignty or control over Alberta territory.** Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the province as a potential “natural partner” for energy cooperation, while Trump has repeatedly floated broader “51st state” rhetoric toward Canada amid ongoing tariff disputes. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has prioritized energy exports and an October 2026 referendum focused on provincial autonomy rather than U.S. acquisition, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has consistently reaffirmed Canadian sovereignty. State Department clarifications framed the separatist meetings as routine without commitments, and no qualifying territorial claim has emerged. These factors, combined with the absence of concrete steps toward acquisition by year-end, underpin trader consensus favoring “No.”
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump or the US federal government publicly announces that Trump or the United States is seeking to take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Sovereignty or control refers to any attempt to bring part of the territory of Alberta under the legal governance and jurisdiction of the United States, including as a state, territory, or other classification within the US system, or through an arrangement in which the US otherwise exercises governance and jurisdiction in the territory. Commercial agreements, trade deals, or other actions that do not seek formal US governance or jurisdiction over the territory will not count.
A qualifying announcement must directly state either ongoing direct efforts, or a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over a portion of the territory of Alberta (e.g. “We are going to take Alberta” or “We are trying to take Alberta” would count). Statements that express a desire to control Alberta, but do not express a clear intent to engage in direct efforts to take sovereignty or control over Albertan territory (e.g. “We want Alberta,” or “We’re looking into purchasing Alberta”) will not count.
A consensus of credible reporting that the United States is undertaking ongoing direct efforts or negotiations to acquire, purchase, annex, or otherwise take sovereignty or control over any portion of the territory of Alberta will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution.
The primary resolution sources will be official information from Donald Trump and the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$3,738วันสิ้นสุด
Dec 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Feb 6, 2026, 5:59 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**Trump administration contacts with Alberta separatist groups earlier in 2026, including meetings with the Alberta Prosperity Project, have fueled speculation, yet no public announcement or action has sought U.S. sovereignty or control over Alberta territory.** Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the province as a potential “natural partner” for energy cooperation, while Trump has repeatedly floated broader “51st state” rhetoric toward Canada amid ongoing tariff disputes. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has prioritized energy exports and an October 2026 referendum focused on provincial autonomy rather than U.S. acquisition, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has consistently reaffirmed Canadian sovereignty. State Department clarifications framed the separatist meetings as routine without commitments, and no qualifying territorial claim has emerged. These factors, combined with the absence of concrete steps toward acquisition by year-end, underpin trader consensus favoring “No.”
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย