Anthropic’s commanding lead in trader sentiment stems from Claude Opus 4.7 and Sonnet 4.6, which posted top-tier results on coding and agentic benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified above 92 percent and strong Intelligence Index scores following their April releases. These models combine a 1-million-token context window with reliable computer-use capabilities that developers and enterprises have quickly adopted. Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro remains a close second, topping several general-reasoning metrics including ARC-AGI-2 at 77 percent and GPQA Diamond, yet trails in practical coding workflows. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, launched in late April, delivered incremental gains in math and reduced hallucinations but has not displaced Claude’s edge in the categories traders weigh most heavily. With resolution set for end of June, any new model drops or benchmark updates in the coming weeks could still shift the narrow gap between the leaders.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоЯка компанія має найкращу модель ШІ наприкінці червня?
Anthropic 71.8%
Google 21%
OpenAI 6%
xAI <1%
$6,014,198 Обс.
$6,014,198 Обс.

Anthropic
72%

21%

OpenAI
6%

xAI
1%

Meta
1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Amazon
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Baidu
<1%
Anthropic 71.8%
Google 21%
OpenAI 6%
xAI <1%
$6,014,198 Обс.
$6,014,198 Обс.

Anthropic
72%

21%

OpenAI
6%

xAI
1%

Meta
1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Amazon
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Baidu
<1%
Results from the "Rank" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Ринок відкрито: Oct 10, 2025, 5:27 PM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Results from the "Rank" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking system.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Anthropic’s commanding lead in trader sentiment stems from Claude Opus 4.7 and Sonnet 4.6, which posted top-tier results on coding and agentic benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified above 92 percent and strong Intelligence Index scores following their April releases. These models combine a 1-million-token context window with reliable computer-use capabilities that developers and enterprises have quickly adopted. Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro remains a close second, topping several general-reasoning metrics including ARC-AGI-2 at 77 percent and GPQA Diamond, yet trails in practical coding workflows. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, launched in late April, delivered incremental gains in math and reduced hallucinations but has not displaced Claude’s edge in the categories traders weigh most heavily. With resolution set for end of June, any new model drops or benchmark updates in the coming weeks could still shift the narrow gap between the leaders.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання