US-brokered talks have centered on territorial issues since early 2026, with Russia conditioning any ceasefire on Ukraine withdrawing from remaining Donetsk areas it controls and recognizing annexed regions. Washington has linked security guarantees to Kyiv accepting concessions in Donbas, while Ukrainian officials reject unilateral withdrawals and note that major decisions would require referendums. Battlefield shifts, including Ukrainian net territorial gains in May 2026 alongside Russian advances in July, have not altered core positions. Public opposition in Ukraine to formal cessions remains high, and no agreement resolving the land question has emerged from rounds in Abu Dhabi or Geneva. Negotiations continue without a fixed near-term deadline, leaving trader views sensitive to any shifts in US pressure or battlefield momentum.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$735,574 交易量

2026年12月31日
9%

2026年8月31日
1%
$735,574 交易量

2026年12月31日
9%

2026年8月31日
1%
The deal must be a publicly announced mutual agreement or otherwise confirmed by an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting.
If such an agreement is officially reached before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes", regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
Only territory ceded as part of a diplomatic process or agreement will qualify.
If a territorial adjustment is made as part of a mutual border demarcation process or technical boundary agreement that does not materially alter de facto control or reflect a broader territorial concession, it will not qualify for a 'Yes' resolution unless it is reported as a territorial concession by a consensus of credible reporting.
Any agreement which cedes de facto military control of territory held by Ukraine will qualify regardless of whether Ukraine formally maintains its claim to sovereignty. For example, the 1999 Kumanovo Military Technical Agreement, in which Yugoslavia agreed to pull military forces out of Kosovo but did not recognize Kosovo’s autonomy or independence would qualify for a 'Yes' resolution.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine and/or the Russian Federation, however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
市场开放时间: Nov 13, 2025, 4:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The deal must be a publicly announced mutual agreement or otherwise confirmed by an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting.
If such an agreement is officially reached before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes", regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
Only territory ceded as part of a diplomatic process or agreement will qualify.
If a territorial adjustment is made as part of a mutual border demarcation process or technical boundary agreement that does not materially alter de facto control or reflect a broader territorial concession, it will not qualify for a 'Yes' resolution unless it is reported as a territorial concession by a consensus of credible reporting.
Any agreement which cedes de facto military control of territory held by Ukraine will qualify regardless of whether Ukraine formally maintains its claim to sovereignty. For example, the 1999 Kumanovo Military Technical Agreement, in which Yugoslavia agreed to pull military forces out of Kosovo but did not recognize Kosovo’s autonomy or independence would qualify for a 'Yes' resolution.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine and/or the Russian Federation, however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...US-brokered talks have centered on territorial issues since early 2026, with Russia conditioning any ceasefire on Ukraine withdrawing from remaining Donetsk areas it controls and recognizing annexed regions. Washington has linked security guarantees to Kyiv accepting concessions in Donbas, while Ukrainian officials reject unilateral withdrawals and note that major decisions would require referendums. Battlefield shifts, including Ukrainian net territorial gains in May 2026 alongside Russian advances in July, have not altered core positions. Public opposition in Ukraine to formal cessions remains high, and no agreement resolving the land question has emerged from rounds in Abu Dhabi or Geneva. Negotiations continue without a fixed near-term deadline, leaving trader views sensitive to any shifts in US pressure or battlefield momentum.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于


警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题