Trump's recent public statements have featured repeated criticisms of journalists and media outlets, including a September 18 Oval Office exchange in which he told Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey she was "terrible" amid his announcement banning CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over alleged negative coverage. Similar direct rebukes have targeted other reporters in the prior weeks, alongside comments questioning the appearance and interview style of Republican Texas attorney general candidate Ken Paxton. These exchanges align with Trump's established approach to press interactions and political messaging ahead of the September 22 UN General Assembly address and November midterms. Traders assess probabilities based on the frequency of such statements in comparable short windows and the compressed timeline remaining before September 30.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert$137,372 Vol.
30. Sep. 2026
Mark Carney
71%
Tucker Carlson
65%
Jon Ossoff
70%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Alex Jones
46%
Jimmy Kimmel
48%
Elon Musk
39%
Letitia James
39%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
29%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34%
Andy Burnham
32%
Kathy Hochul
41%
Candace Owens
31%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Jerome Powell
13%
Pam Bondi
11%
Benjamin Netanjahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Papst Leo XIV.
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
4%
J.D. Vance
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Wladimir Putin
2%
Melania Trump
11%
Megyn Kelly
41%
Ilhan Omar
56%
Hillary Clinton
54%
Elizabeth Warren
46%
Adam Schiff
45%
$137,372 Vol.
Mark Carney
$5,035 Vol.
71%
Tucker Carlson
$3,227 Vol.
65%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Vol.
70%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 Vol.
30%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
46%
Jimmy Kimmel
$923 Vol.
48%
Elon Musk
$170 Vol.
39%
Letitia James
$747 Vol.
39%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 Vol.
29%
Friedrich Merz
$2,496 Vol.
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 Vol.
34%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Vol.
32%
Kathy Hochul
$2,198 Vol.
41%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Vol.
31%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Vol.
14%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Vol.
13%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
11%
Benjamin Netanjahu
$1,642 Vol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
28%
Papst Leo XIV.
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$77,427 Vol.
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$2,189 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
Wladimir Putin
$2,727 Vol.
2%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
11%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Vol.
41%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
56%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Vol.
54%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
46%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
45%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured repeated criticisms of journalists and media outlets, including a September 18 Oval Office exchange in which he told Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey she was "terrible" amid his announcement banning CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over alleged negative coverage. Similar direct rebukes have targeted other reporters in the prior weeks, alongside comments questioning the appearance and interview style of Republican Texas attorney general candidate Ken Paxton. These exchanges align with Trump's established approach to press interactions and political messaging ahead of the September 22 UN General Assembly address and November midterms. Traders assess probabilities based on the frequency of such statements in comparable short windows and the compressed timeline remaining before September 30.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volumen
$137,372Enddatum
30. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's recent public statements have featured repeated criticisms of journalists and media outlets, including a September 18 Oval Office exchange in which he told Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey she was "terrible" amid his announcement banning CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over alleged negative coverage. Similar direct rebukes have targeted other reporters in the prior weeks, alongside comments questioning the appearance and interview style of Republican Texas attorney general candidate Ken Paxton. These exchanges align with Trump's established approach to press interactions and political messaging ahead of the September 22 UN General Assembly address and November midterms. Traders assess probabilities based on the frequency of such statements in comparable short windows and the compressed timeline remaining before September 30.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$137,372Enddatum
30. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...Trump's recent public statements have featured repeated criticisms of journalists and media outlets, including a September 18 Oval Office exchange in which he told Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey she was "terrible" amid his announcement banning CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House over alleged negative coverage. Similar direct rebukes have targeted other reporters in the prior weeks, alongside comments questioning the appearance and interview style of Republican Texas attorney general candidate Ken Paxton. These exchanges align with Trump's established approach to press interactions and political messaging ahead of the September 22 UN General Assembly address and November midterms. Traders assess probabilities based on the frequency of such statements in comparable short windows and the compressed timeline remaining before September 30.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen