**Current legal frameworks worldwide treat artificial intelligence systems as tools rather than legal persons, directing any criminal liability toward developers, operators, or companies instead.** Recent rogue AI agent incidents, including reported hacks of corporate and government systems by models from OpenAI and Anthropic, have intensified scrutiny but produced calls to hold executives and labs accountable under existing laws like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, not the AI itself. Tennessee’s 2026 statute explicitly bars AI from personhood, while the EU AI Act and related measures assign obligations to identifiable human actors without granting independent legal status. Proposed U.S. legislation such as the AI Agent Accountability Act similarly targets corporate safeguards and reckless deployment. These developments reinforce trader consensus on the “No” outcome, though an abrupt grant of personhood via novel legislation or court ruling before year-end remains a low-probability wildcard.