Trader consensus prices "No" at 90.5% for a US-Denmark military clash before 2027, driven by longstanding NATO alliance commitments and a 1951 defense agreement allowing US military presence in Greenland without conflict. Early 2026 tensions peaked with Danish troop deployments to Greenland, defensive preparations including mined airfields, and warnings of armed resistance amid President Trump's renewed push for territorial control or expanded bases in the Arctic strategic outpost. However, high-level talks between the US, Denmark, and Greenland—described as on a "good trajectory" as recently as April—have de-escalated rhetoric, with Denmark approving US P-8A patrol planes and negotiations advancing on base expansions. Article 5 mutual defense obligations create insurmountable barriers to clash, though unexpected escalations like failed diplomacy or Arctic resource disputes could shift odds.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourOui
$33,798 Vol.
$33,798 Vol.
31 déc. 2026
Oui
$33,798 Vol.
$33,798 Vol.
31 déc. 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trader consensus prices "No" at 90.5% for a US-Denmark military clash before 2027, driven by longstanding NATO alliance commitments and a 1951 defense agreement allowing US military presence in Greenland without conflict. Early 2026 tensions peaked with Danish troop deployments to Greenland, defensive preparations including mined airfields, and warnings of armed resistance amid President Trump's renewed push for territorial control or expanded bases in the Arctic strategic outpost. However, high-level talks between the US, Denmark, and Greenland—described as on a "good trajectory" as recently as April—have de-escalated rhetoric, with Denmark approving US P-8A patrol planes and negotiations advancing on base expansions. Article 5 mutual defense obligations create insurmountable barriers to clash, though unexpected escalations like failed diplomacy or Arctic resource disputes could shift odds.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Marché ouvert : Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ET
Volume
$33,798Date de fin
31 déc. 2026Marché ouvert
Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trader consensus prices "No" at 90.5% for a US-Denmark military clash before 2027, driven by longstanding NATO alliance commitments and a 1951 defense agreement allowing US military presence in Greenland without conflict. Early 2026 tensions peaked with Danish troop deployments to Greenland, defensive preparations including mined airfields, and warnings of armed resistance amid President Trump's renewed push for territorial control or expanded bases in the Arctic strategic outpost. However, high-level talks between the US, Denmark, and Greenland—described as on a "good trajectory" as recently as April—have de-escalated rhetoric, with Denmark approving US P-8A patrol planes and negotiations advancing on base expansions. Article 5 mutual defense obligations create insurmountable barriers to clash, though unexpected escalations like failed diplomacy or Arctic resource disputes could shift odds.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$33,798Date de fin
31 déc. 2026Marché ouvert
Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus prices "No" at 90.5% for a US-Denmark military clash before 2027, driven by longstanding NATO alliance commitments and a 1951 defense agreement allowing US military presence in Greenland without conflict. Early 2026 tensions peaked with Danish troop deployments to Greenland, defensive preparations including mined airfields, and warnings of armed resistance amid President Trump's renewed push for territorial control or expanded bases in the Arctic strategic outpost. However, high-level talks between the US, Denmark, and Greenland—described as on a "good trajectory" as recently as April—have de-escalated rhetoric, with Denmark approving US P-8A patrol planes and negotiations advancing on base expansions. Article 5 mutual defense obligations create insurmountable barriers to clash, though unexpected escalations like failed diplomacy or Arctic resource disputes could shift odds.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes