Trump's longstanding pattern of issuing pointed public criticisms via speeches, interviews, and Truth Social posts continues to shape trader assessments for this market, with recent examples including sharp rebukes of journalists such as Kristen Welker and Kaitlan Collins during tense exchanges, repeated references to Democrats as "Dumocrats," and comments directed at figures like Tucker Carlson amid policy disagreements over Iran. Ongoing diplomatic friction with Iran, including claims about negotiations and publicity, adds potential for further rhetoric, while scheduled media appearances and campaign-style events before June 30 could prompt additional name-calling. Traders weigh the short remaining window against the president's history of spontaneous reactions to criticism or policy pushback from media, opponents, or even allies.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui$797,996 Vol.
Jun 30, 2026
Norah O'Donnell
41%
Megyn Kelly
37%
Jimmy Kimmel
39%
Nicolás Maduro
36%
Keir Starmer
27%
Alex Jones
31%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Emmanuel Macron
19%
Freidrich Merz
18%
Benjamin Netanyahu
15%
Elon Musk
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Pam Bondi
5%
Vladimir Putin
4%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Melania Trump
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
$797,996 Vol.
Norah O'Donnell
$623 Vol.
41%
Megyn Kelly
$457 Vol.
37%
Jimmy Kimmel
$41,096 Vol.
39%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,132 Vol.
36%
Keir Starmer
$1,413 Vol.
27%
Alex Jones
$448 Vol.
31%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,460 Vol.
30%
Emmanuel Macron
$9,347 Vol.
19%
Freidrich Merz
$7,876 Vol.
18%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$77,568 Vol.
15%
Elon Musk
$6,720 Vol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$5,144 Vol.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$11,561 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$3,115 Vol.
5%
Vladimir Putin
$11,229 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$4,335 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$47,605 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$6,591 Vol.
2%
Viktor Orbán
$4,776 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's longstanding pattern of issuing pointed public criticisms via speeches, interviews, and Truth Social posts continues to shape trader assessments for this market, with recent examples including sharp rebukes of journalists such as Kristen Welker and Kaitlan Collins during tense exchanges, repeated references to Democrats as "Dumocrats," and comments directed at figures like Tucker Carlson amid policy disagreements over Iran. Ongoing diplomatic friction with Iran, including claims about negotiations and publicity, adds potential for further rhetoric, while scheduled media appearances and campaign-style events before June 30 could prompt additional name-calling. Traders weigh the short remaining window against the president's history of spontaneous reactions to criticism or policy pushback from media, opponents, or even allies.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ET
Volume
$797,996Tanggal Berakhir
Jun 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's longstanding pattern of issuing pointed public criticisms via speeches, interviews, and Truth Social posts continues to shape trader assessments for this market, with recent examples including sharp rebukes of journalists such as Kristen Welker and Kaitlan Collins during tense exchanges, repeated references to Democrats as "Dumocrats," and comments directed at figures like Tucker Carlson amid policy disagreements over Iran. Ongoing diplomatic friction with Iran, including claims about negotiations and publicity, adds potential for further rhetoric, while scheduled media appearances and campaign-style events before June 30 could prompt additional name-calling. Traders weigh the short remaining window against the president's history of spontaneous reactions to criticism or policy pushback from media, opponents, or even allies.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$797,996Tanggal Berakhir
Jun 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's longstanding pattern of issuing pointed public criticisms via speeches, interviews, and Truth Social posts continues to shape trader assessments for this market, with recent examples including sharp rebukes of journalists such as Kristen Welker and Kaitlan Collins during tense exchanges, repeated references to Democrats as "Dumocrats," and comments directed at figures like Tucker Carlson amid policy disagreements over Iran. Ongoing diplomatic friction with Iran, including claims about negotiations and publicity, adds potential for further rhetoric, while scheduled media appearances and campaign-style events before June 30 could prompt additional name-calling. Traders weigh the short remaining window against the president's history of spontaneous reactions to criticism or policy pushback from media, opponents, or even allies.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan