Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls maintains a clear edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for her North Carolina Supreme Court seat, backed by a substantial fundraising advantage and recent polling leads over Republican challenger Sarah Stevens. Earls raised nearly $1.9 million in the second quarter alone and holds roughly $3.5 million in cash on hand, compared with Stevens’ approximately $90,000 raised and $258,000 cash. September polling showed Earls ahead 47-36 percent with 16 percent undecided, while earlier surveys placed the candidates nearly even. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to focus on the race, which centers on contrasting records regarding voting rights, redistricting, and criminal procedure. Trader consensus reflected in current pricing aligns with these structural and resource disparities ahead of the general election.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhậtNorth Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
North Carolina Supreme Court Election Winner
MỚI
MỚI
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
78%
Sarah Stevens (R)
20%
MỚI
MỚI
Nov 3, 2026
Anita Earls (D)
$1,136 KL.
78%
Sarah Stevens (R)
$186 KL.
20%
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls maintains a clear edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for her North Carolina Supreme Court seat, backed by a substantial fundraising advantage and recent polling leads over Republican challenger Sarah Stevens. Earls raised nearly $1.9 million in the second quarter alone and holds roughly $3.5 million in cash on hand, compared with Stevens’ approximately $90,000 raised and $258,000 cash. September polling showed Earls ahead 47-36 percent with 16 percent undecided, while earlier surveys placed the candidates nearly even. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to focus on the race, which centers on contrasting records regarding voting rights, redistricting, and criminal procedure. Trader consensus reflected in current pricing aligns with these structural and resource disparities ahead of the general election.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Thị trường mở: Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ET
Khối lượng
$1,322Ngày kết thúc
Nov 4, 2026Thị trường mở
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETNgười giải quyết
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls maintains a clear edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for her North Carolina Supreme Court seat, backed by a substantial fundraising advantage and recent polling leads over Republican challenger Sarah Stevens. Earls raised nearly $1.9 million in the second quarter alone and holds roughly $3.5 million in cash on hand, compared with Stevens’ approximately $90,000 raised and $258,000 cash. September polling showed Earls ahead 47-36 percent with 16 percent undecided, while earlier surveys placed the candidates nearly even. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to focus on the race, which centers on contrasting records regarding voting rights, redistricting, and criminal procedure. Trader consensus reflected in current pricing aligns with these structural and resource disparities ahead of the general election.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Khối lượng
$1,322Ngày kết thúc
Nov 4, 2026Thị trường mở
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETNgười giải quyết
0x69c47De9D...Incumbent Democratic Justice Anita Earls maintains a clear edge in the November 3, 2026, partisan contest for her North Carolina Supreme Court seat, backed by a substantial fundraising advantage and recent polling leads over Republican challenger Sarah Stevens. Earls raised nearly $1.9 million in the second quarter alone and holds roughly $3.5 million in cash on hand, compared with Stevens’ approximately $90,000 raised and $258,000 cash. September polling showed Earls ahead 47-36 percent with 16 percent undecided, while earlier surveys placed the candidates nearly even. Stevens resigned her state House seat in June to focus on the race, which centers on contrasting records regarding voting rights, redistricting, and criminal procedure. Trader consensus reflected in current pricing aligns with these structural and resource disparities ahead of the general election.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhật
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Câu hỏi thường gặp