President Donald Trump's pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts and speeches continues to shape trader assessments for outcomes by May 31. In the past two weeks he has targeted Pope Leo XIV over claims of endangering Catholics and supporting Iran's nuclear ambitions ahead of a Vatican visit by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, accused former President Obama of treason in a late-night series of posts, and insulted journalists during a May 12 White House event on spending and inflation questions. Earlier attacks on former FBI Director James Comey and Representative Ilhan Omar also remain part of the record. These recurring exchanges, often tied to policy disputes or press interactions, provide the immediate context for evaluating which figures could face renewed scrutiny in the final two weeks of the resolution window.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado$102,555 Vol.
31 may 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
62%
Friedrich Merz
37%
Tucker Carlson
41%
Nicolás Maduro
33%
Megyn Kelly
21%
Keir Starmer
19%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Kaitlan Collins
16%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Alex Jones
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Elon Musk
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$102,555 Vol.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,569 Vol.
62%
Friedrich Merz
$1,791 Vol.
37%
Tucker Carlson
$4,416 Vol.
41%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,389 Vol.
33%
Megyn Kelly
$3,383 Vol.
21%
Keir Starmer
$2,766 Vol.
19%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Vol.
19%
Kaitlan Collins
$262 Vol.
16%
Emmanuel Macron
$537 Vol.
12%
Alex Jones
$77 Vol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Vol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$130 Vol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,385 Vol.
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$426 Vol.
4%
Elon Musk
$1,468 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,441 Vol.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,313 Vol.
3%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Vol.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump's pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts and speeches continues to shape trader assessments for outcomes by May 31. In the past two weeks he has targeted Pope Leo XIV over claims of endangering Catholics and supporting Iran's nuclear ambitions ahead of a Vatican visit by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, accused former President Obama of treason in a late-night series of posts, and insulted journalists during a May 12 White House event on spending and inflation questions. Earlier attacks on former FBI Director James Comey and Representative Ilhan Omar also remain part of the record. These recurring exchanges, often tied to policy disputes or press interactions, provide the immediate context for evaluating which figures could face renewed scrutiny in the final two weeks of the resolution window.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
Volumen
$102,555Fecha de finalización
31 may 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump's pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts and speeches continues to shape trader assessments for outcomes by May 31. In the past two weeks he has targeted Pope Leo XIV over claims of endangering Catholics and supporting Iran's nuclear ambitions ahead of a Vatican visit by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, accused former President Obama of treason in a late-night series of posts, and insulted journalists during a May 12 White House event on spending and inflation questions. Earlier attacks on former FBI Director James Comey and Representative Ilhan Omar also remain part of the record. These recurring exchanges, often tied to policy disputes or press interactions, provide the immediate context for evaluating which figures could face renewed scrutiny in the final two weeks of the resolution window.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$102,555Fecha de finalización
31 may 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump's pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts and speeches continues to shape trader assessments for outcomes by May 31. In the past two weeks he has targeted Pope Leo XIV over claims of endangering Catholics and supporting Iran's nuclear ambitions ahead of a Vatican visit by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, accused former President Obama of treason in a late-night series of posts, and insulted journalists during a May 12 White House event on spending and inflation questions. Earlier attacks on former FBI Director James Comey and Representative Ilhan Omar also remain part of the record. These recurring exchanges, often tied to policy disputes or press interactions, provide the immediate context for evaluating which figures could face renewed scrutiny in the final two weeks of the resolution window.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes