North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoVincitore delle elezioni della Corte Suprema della Carolina del Nord
Vincitore delle elezioni della Corte Suprema della Carolina del Nord
NUOVO
NUOVO
3 nov 2026
Anita Earls (D)
59%
Sarah Stevens (R)
36%
NUOVO
NUOVO
3 nov 2026
Anita Earls (D)
$0 Vol.
59%
Sarah Stevens (R)
$0 Vol.
36%
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Mercato aperto: Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ET
Volume
$0Data di fine
4 nov 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETRisolutore
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 North Carolina Supreme Court election.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee of the party in question. Candidates other than the Democratic or Republican nominee (e.g., Greens, Libertarian, independent) may be added at a later date.
Candidates who run as independents will not be encompassed by the “Democrat” or “Republican” options regardless of any affiliation they may have with the party.
The resolution source for this market is the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC. This market will resolve once all three sources call the race for the same candidate. If all three sources haven’t called the race in this state for the same candidate, this market will resolve based on the official certification.
Volume
$0Data di fine
4 nov 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 3, 2026, 6:05 PM ETRisolutore
0x69c47De9D...North Carolina's November 3, 2026, partisan election for the Supreme Court associate justice seat pits Democratic incumbent Anita Earls against Republican challenger Sarah Stevens in a race that remains tightly balanced. Recent polling averages show the candidates within a few points of each other, reflecting North Carolina's status as a swing state and the court's existing partisan split. Earls holds a substantial cash-on-hand advantage from fundraising, while Stevens resigned her House seat in June to focus full-time on the contest and leverage her legislative record. With no primary challenges and the general election two months away, voter turnout patterns, campaign spending in the final stretch, and any late shifts in statewide sentiment could determine the outcome and influence future court composition.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti