President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato$106,909 Vol.
31 mag 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
80%
Nicolás Maduro
39%
Friedrich Merz
35%
Tucker Carlson
27%
Megyn Kelly
22%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Kaitlan Collins
17%
Keir Starmer
14%
Alex Jones
13%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
J.D. Vance
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$106,909 Vol.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$2,989 Vol.
80%
Nicolás Maduro
$6,406 Vol.
39%
Friedrich Merz
$1,791 Vol.
35%
Tucker Carlson
$4,451 Vol.
27%
Megyn Kelly
$3,417 Vol.
22%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Vol.
19%
Kaitlan Collins
$262 Vol.
17%
Keir Starmer
$2,925 Vol.
14%
Alex Jones
$87 Vol.
13%
Emmanuel Macron
$583 Vol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Vol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$130 Vol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,436 Vol.
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$452 Vol.
4%
Elon Musk
$1,684 Vol.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,404 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,687 Vol.
2%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Vol.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercato aperto: Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
Volume
$106,909Data di fine
31 mag 2026Mercato aperto
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$106,909Data di fine
31 mag 2026Mercato aperto
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s pattern of direct public criticism through social media posts and campaign remarks continues to shape trader views on potential targets before May 31. Recent statements have included nicknames for Democrats and pointed attacks on figures such as Texas state Senator James Talarico over policy positions on gender and personal habits, alongside rebukes of reporters questioning White House renovation costs. These exchanges reflect ongoing partisan tensions and executive priorities, with traders tracking daily Truth Social activity and scheduled appearances for signs of new confrontations. Historical precedent shows frequent use of such rhetoric during policy debates or media interactions, though the short remaining window limits certainty around specific individuals.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti