Amid the US-Iran war that erupted on February 28, 2026, Kharg Island—Iran's critical oil export terminal handling 90% of its shipments—remains under firm Iranian control despite repeated US airstrikes on military targets there in March and April, a tightening naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, and threats of ground seizure. Satellite imagery as of May 12 shows the first prolonged halt in oil loadings from the island's jetties since the conflict began, alongside suspected oil slicks detected May 8–11, intensifying economic pressure on Tehran without altering territorial possession. President Trump rejected occupation plans citing high US casualty risks, while indirect talks via Pakistan advanced in mid-April but stalled. Traders price "No" above 94% for loss of control by May 31, with potential escalation from further strikes or diplomatic breakthroughs as key risks before resolution.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoA Ilha Kharg não está mais sob o controle iraniano por...?
A Ilha Kharg não está mais sob o controle iraniano por...?
$42,737,174 Vol.
31 de maio
4%
30 de junho
9%
$42,737,174 Vol.
31 de maio
4%
30 de junho
9%
“No longer under the control of Iran” means that Iran no longer exercises primary governmental or military control over Kharg Island, and another state, occupying force, or internationally backed authority has established control over the island.
Temporary raids, isolated landings, special operations, bombardment, sabotage, naval presence offshore, or temporary disruption of Iranian activity will not qualify on their own.
An announcement, threat, or claim that Iran has lost control will not qualify without actual control being established.
If control changes pursuant to a negotiated settlement, ceasefire term, surrender, or transfer agreement, this will qualify only once actual control has been established on the island.
If control over Kharg Island is contested, unclear, disputed, or not sufficiently established by the resolution date, this will not qualify, and the market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official statements from the relevant governments and militaries, along with a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado Aberto: Mar 24, 2026, 4:13 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...“No longer under the control of Iran” means that Iran no longer exercises primary governmental or military control over Kharg Island, and another state, occupying force, or internationally backed authority has established control over the island.
Temporary raids, isolated landings, special operations, bombardment, sabotage, naval presence offshore, or temporary disruption of Iranian activity will not qualify on their own.
An announcement, threat, or claim that Iran has lost control will not qualify without actual control being established.
If control changes pursuant to a negotiated settlement, ceasefire term, surrender, or transfer agreement, this will qualify only once actual control has been established on the island.
If control over Kharg Island is contested, unclear, disputed, or not sufficiently established by the resolution date, this will not qualify, and the market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official statements from the relevant governments and militaries, along with a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Amid the US-Iran war that erupted on February 28, 2026, Kharg Island—Iran's critical oil export terminal handling 90% of its shipments—remains under firm Iranian control despite repeated US airstrikes on military targets there in March and April, a tightening naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, and threats of ground seizure. Satellite imagery as of May 12 shows the first prolonged halt in oil loadings from the island's jetties since the conflict began, alongside suspected oil slicks detected May 8–11, intensifying economic pressure on Tehran without altering territorial possession. President Trump rejected occupation plans citing high US casualty risks, while indirect talks via Pakistan advanced in mid-April but stalled. Traders price "No" above 94% for loss of control by May 31, with potential escalation from further strikes or diplomatic breakthroughs as key risks before resolution.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions