Donald Trump's public communications have long featured direct criticism of political opponents, media figures, and institutions, a pattern that continues in his current role as president. Recent statements on Truth Social and at official events have maintained this approach amid ongoing legislative debates, foreign policy matters, and partisan disputes, with no major change in tone observed in the past month. Traders assess the likelihood of further instances based on his established record, scheduled appearances such as press briefings or summits, and any procedural constraints tied to his executive position. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during comparable periods inform assessments of how external events might trigger additional remarks.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วWill Trump publicly insult someone on...?
Will Trump publicly insult someone on...?
$480,679 ปริมาณ
May 31, 2026
May 16
92%
May 17
90%
May 18
87%
May 19
87%
May 20
88%
May 21
89%
May 22
88%
May 23
90%
May 24
89%
May 25
89%
May 26
87%
May 27
88%
May 28
86%
May 29
86%
May 30
88%
May 31
87%
$480,679 ปริมาณ
May 16
$8,556 ปริมาณ
92%
May 17
$9,789 ปริมาณ
90%
May 18
$1,849 ปริมาณ
87%
May 19
$1,246 ปริมาณ
87%
May 20
$1,059 ปริมาณ
88%
May 21
$455 ปริมาณ
89%
May 22
$794 ปริมาณ
88%
May 23
$104 ปริมาณ
90%
May 24
$433 ปริมาณ
89%
May 25
$608 ปริมาณ
89%
May 26
$689 ปริมาณ
87%
May 27
$1,003 ปริมาณ
88%
May 28
$501 ปริมาณ
86%
May 29
$378 ปริมาณ
86%
May 30
$96 ปริมาณ
88%
May 31
$369 ปริมาณ
87%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Donald Trump's public communications have long featured direct criticism of political opponents, media figures, and institutions, a pattern that continues in his current role as president. Recent statements on Truth Social and at official events have maintained this approach amid ongoing legislative debates, foreign policy matters, and partisan disputes, with no major change in tone observed in the past month. Traders assess the likelihood of further instances based on his established record, scheduled appearances such as press briefings or summits, and any procedural constraints tied to his executive position. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during comparable periods inform assessments of how external events might trigger additional remarks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$480,679วันสิ้นสุด
May 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Donald Trump's public communications have long featured direct criticism of political opponents, media figures, and institutions, a pattern that continues in his current role as president. Recent statements on Truth Social and at official events have maintained this approach amid ongoing legislative debates, foreign policy matters, and partisan disputes, with no major change in tone observed in the past month. Traders assess the likelihood of further instances based on his established record, scheduled appearances such as press briefings or summits, and any procedural constraints tied to his executive position. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during comparable periods inform assessments of how external events might trigger additional remarks.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$480,679วันสิ้นสุด
May 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Donald Trump's public communications have long featured direct criticism of political opponents, media figures, and institutions, a pattern that continues in his current role as president. Recent statements on Truth Social and at official events have maintained this approach amid ongoing legislative debates, foreign policy matters, and partisan disputes, with no major change in tone observed in the past month. Traders assess the likelihood of further instances based on his established record, scheduled appearances such as press briefings or summits, and any procedural constraints tied to his executive position. Historical patterns of similar rhetoric during comparable periods inform assessments of how external events might trigger additional remarks.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย